Patna High Court
RAMJI PRASADversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISS FOR NON-PROSECUTION
- Bench
- SONI SHRIVASTAVA
Holding
The application is dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Summary
Ramji Prasad filed a criminal miscellaneous application before the Patna High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing despite repeated notices on 08-12-2025 and 29-01-2026. The State, represented by Advocate Anil Kumar Singh, was present. The court observed that the petitioner had apparently lost interest in pursuing the case. Consequently, the court dismissed the application on the ground of non‑prosecution.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate consequence when a petitioner repeatedly fails to appear and shows no interest in pursuing the case?
Subjects
- non-prosecution
- dismissal
- criminal miscellaneous
- petitioner's default
- court procedure
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53422 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-46 Year-2022 Thana- HATHIDAH District- Patna
======================================================
RAMJI PRASAD SON OF LATE BASUDEV PRASAD R/O VILLAGE-
AUNTA RAMTOLA, P.S.- HATHIDAH, DISTRICT- PATNA.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. THE STATE OF BIHAR
2. CHANDRABHUSHAN SINGH SONO F LATE RAMESH PRASAD
SINGH R/O VILLAGE- AUNTA RAGHURAM, P.S.- HATHIDAH,
DISTRICT- PATNA
3. PASHUPATI SINGH SON OF LATE NARAYAN SINGH R/O VILLAGE-
AUNTA RAGHURAM TOLA, P.S.- HATHIDAH, DISTRICT- PATNA
4. KRISHNA MURARI SHARMA @ KRISHNA MURARI SINGH SON OF
LATE AKHILESH PRASAD SHARMA @ LATE AKHILESH SINGH R/O
VILLAGE- AUNTA RAGHURAM TOLA, P.S.- HATHIDAH, DISTRICT-
PATNA
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : None.
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Singh No.1, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA
ORAL ORDER
4 02-02-2026 In spite of repeated calls, none appeared on behalf of
the petitioner. On 08.12.2025 and 29.01.2026 also none had
appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
2. Learned APP for the State is present before the
Court.
3. It appears that the petitioner has lost his interest in
the case.
4. Accordingly, this application is dismissed for non-
prosecution.
(Soni Shrivastava, J)
Trivedi/-
U T
Checking your session…