Patna High Court
Ram Vinod SinghversusThe State Of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- SONI SHRIVASTAVA
Holding
The application for cancellation of bail was dismissed, and the petitioner was permitted to withdraw it and approach the appropriate court for relief.
Summary
The petitioner, Ram Vinod Singh, filed an application seeking cancellation of the bail that had been granted to him, alleging that the opposite party No.2, Rekha Devi, was threatening witnesses. The petitioner later requested to withdraw this application and instead approach the court that originally granted bail for any remedy concerning alleged witness intimidation. The court noted that the petitioner's claim of witness threat was not substantiated and was made only orally during the hearing. Consequently, the court found no sufficient ground to entertain the cancellation of bail at this stage. The application was therefore disposed of, with the court granting the petitioner liberty to approach the appropriate court for redress. No statutory provisions or precedents were cited in the order.
Issues considered
- Whether the application for cancellation of bail can be entertained in the absence of concrete evidence of witness intimidation
- Whether the petitioner may withdraw the application and seek remedy before the court that granted bail
Subjects
- bail
- cancellation of bail
- witness intimidation
- application withdrawal
- criminal procedure
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53464 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-498 Year-2023 Thana- KUDHNI District- Muzaffarpur
======================================================
Ram Vinod Singh Son of Mahindra Singh R/o Vill.- Purushottampur. P.S.-
Kudhni, Distt.- Muzaffarpur
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar BIHAR
2. Rekha Devi Wife of Mukesh Kumar Singh R/o Vill.- Purushottampur. P.S.-
Kudhni, Distt.- Muzaffarpur
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Naresh Singh, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Renu Kumari, APP
For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Kaushal Kishore, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA
ORAL ORDER
3 09-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP
for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party no.2.
2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the
petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present application for
cancellation of bail in order to seek his remedy before the
learned Court concerned which has granted the privilege of bail,
in case there is any supervening circumstance of threatening of
witnesses by the opposite party no.2. It is however, made clear
that as of now the petition filed for cancellation does not bear
any ground with regard to threatening of witnesses and such
submission has been made orally by the learned counsel for the
petitioner.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53464 of 2024(3) dt.09-01-2026
2/2
3. Accordingly, the present application is disposed of
with the aforesaid liberty granted to the petitioner to approach
before the concerned Court for redressal of his grievance.
(Soni Shrivastava, J)
anand/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.