Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Md. SalmanversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted bail to the petitioners, subject to specified conditions.

Summary

The petitioners, Md. Salman and Pikku Kumar, were arrested on 28 September 2025 in connection with a Sessions case arising from an alleged unlawful assembly and firing between two communities over a land dispute. The FIR alleged offences under several sections of the Bihar Penal Code and the Arms Act, and weapons were recovered from a co‑accused’s residence, but no specific act of assault was directly attributed to the petitioners. The petitioners argued that they have a clean antecedent and were implicated only on a general, omnibus basis, seeking bail after more than three months of custody. The State opposed the bail application, contending the seriousness of the charges. The High Court, noting the absence of specific allegations against the petitioners and their clean record, granted bail subject to monetary surety and conditions regarding cooperation, non‑tampering with evidence, and verification of antecedents.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioners despite the serious charges under the Bihar Penal Code and Arms Act.
  • Whether the general allegations in the FIR constitute sufficient ground to deny bail in the absence of specific evidence against the petitioners.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • unlawful assembly
  • arms possession
  • clean antecedent
  • criminal procedure
  • session case
  • land dispute

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5370 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-81 Year-2025 Thana- Safiyasarai District- Munger
                 ======================================================
           1.     Md. Salman S/O Haroon
           2.    Pikku Kumar @ Pinku S/O Gorakh Paswan Resident of Mohammadpur
                 Farda P.S - Safiasarai,Dist- Munger.

                                                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :         Mr.Dinesh Gupta,Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :         Mr.Humayou Ahmad Khan, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   28-01-2026                  Heard         Mr.Dinesh Gupta,          learned counsel for the

                   petitioners and Mr.Humayou Ahmad Khan, learned Additional

                   Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                2. The petitioners seek bail, who are in custody since

                   28.09.2025 in connection with Sessions Case No. 512 of 2025,

                   arising out of Safiasarai P.S.Case No.81/2025, F.I.R. dated

                   27.09.2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections

                   191(2), 191(3), 109, 126(2), 115(2),132,196,109(1),285 of BNS

                   and Sections 30/27 of Arms Act.

                                3. As         per   prosecution         case,     police     received

                   information about huge unlawful assembly of two communities

                   resorting to firing over each other in the background of land

                   dispute. Police party reached at the spot and tried to pacify the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5370 of 2026(2) dt.28-01-2026
                                            2/4




          members of unlawful assembly. But they did not pay any heed

          to the advise of the police party and started scuffling with it.

          Thereafter, co-accused, person, namely, Sethu Kumar was

          apprehended along with ten other persons. The other co-accused

          persons have been named by the local Chowkidar as the persons

          who along with other co-accused persons fled away from the

          spot. The recovery of 12 bore gun, revolver and cartridges of

          different bores were recovered from the house of co-accused

          Bablu Mallick.

                       4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners

          submits      that     the     petitioners      have   clean   antecedent.

          It appears from the FIR that although the petitioners are named

          in the FIR but there is no specific allegation of any assault or

          overt-act attributed against the petitioners rather there is general

          and omnibus allegation against all the accused persons including

          the petitioners and arms have been recovered from possession of

          co-accused person, namely, Bablu Mallick and petitioners have

          been made accused in the present case merely on the basis of

          suspicion and except the aforesaid, no other cogent material has

          come during investigation against the petitioners to suggest the

          involvement of the petitioners in the present occurrence. The

          police, after investigation, submitted chargesheet against the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5370 of 2026(2) dt.28-01-2026
                                            3/4




          petitioners and the petitioners are in custody since 28.09.2025.

                         5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently

          opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioners.

                       6. Considering the aforesaid facts, petitioners have

          clean antecedent, there is no specific allegation of any assault or

          overt-act attributed against the petitioners and nothing has been

          recovered from possession of the petitioners, let the petitioners,

          above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of

          Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand)each with two sureties of the like

          amount each to the satisfaction of learned District and

          Additional Sessions Judge 2nd Munger/concerned court in

          connection with Sessions Case No. 512 of 2025, arising out of

          Safiasarai P.S.Case No.81/2025, with the following conditions:-

                       (I) Petitioners shall co-operate in the trial and shall be

          properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court

          and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and

          on theri absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient

          reason, their bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

                       (II) If the petitioners tamper with the evidence or the

          witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move

          for cancellation of bail.

                       (III) And, further condition that the court below shall
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5370 of 2026(2) dt.28-01-2026
                                                           4/4




                         verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioners and in case at

                         any stage, it is found that the petitioners have concealed their

                         criminal antecedents, the court below shall take step for

                         cancellation of bail bond of the petitioners. However, the

                         acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order

                         shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of

                         verification.



                                                (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Nitesh/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.