Patna High Court
RAM BIHARI PRASAD VERMAversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- SONI SHRIVASTAVA
Holding
The Court granted the petitioner liberty to move before the concerned court to ventilate his grievance and disposed of the application.
Summary
Ram Bihari Prasad Verma filed a criminal miscellaneous application alleging that the lower court failed to consider the four criminal antecedents of the opposite party No.2, Hathi Gope @ Abhishek Kumar, and incorrectly recorded that the petitioner had no criminal antecedent. The petitioner sought relief to ventilate his grievance regarding the alleged suppression of facts by the opposite party. The High Court examined the petitioner's submission and noted the grievance about the lower court's omission. The Court granted the petitioner liberty to approach the concerned lower court to raise his grievance. Consequently, the High Court disposed of the application after granting the liberty.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner is entitled to liberty to approach the lower court to ventilate his grievance regarding the alleged suppression of the opposite party's criminal antecedents.
Subjects
- criminal antecedents
- suppression of facts
- liberty to approach
- high court order
- criminal miscellaneous application
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53985 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-277 Year-2022 Thana- RUPASPUR District- Patna
======================================================
RAM BIHARI PRASAD VERMA Son of Late mahadeo Prasad Resident of
Village - in front of Shiv Mandir, Gola Road, Danapur, P.s.- Rupaspur, Distt.-
Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Hathi Gope @ Abhishek Kumar Son of Anil Rai Resident of Village - New
Gosai Tola, Sultanpur, P.S.- Danapur, Distt.- Patna.
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Naresh Chandra Verma, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Madhuri Lata, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA
ORAL ORDER
3 06-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted
that despite the fact that he had produced before the Court
concerned the case details of the criminal antecedents of the
opposite party no.2 being four in number, the learned Court
concerned did not consider the same and has rather stated that
the petitioner has no criminal antecedent according to
paragraph-36 of the case diary and hence, the petitioner desires
to move before the same Court for ventilating his grievance with
regard to such suppression of fact made by the opposite party
no.2.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53985 of 2022(3) dt.06-01-2026
2/2
3. In such view of the matter, the petitioner is granted
liberty to move before the Court concerned for ventilating his
grievance.
4. With the aforesaid liberty, this application is
disposed of.
(Soni Shrivastava, J)
anand/-
U T
Checking your session…