Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Dhanji YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court held that the anticipatory bail application may be withdrawn upon the petitioner's request.

Summary

The petitioner, Dhanji Yadav, filed an anticipatory bail application under the criminal procedure against the State of Bihar and an accused. The petitioner, through counsel, later sought the court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The State, represented by an Assistant Public Prosecutor, opposed the withdrawal. The Hon'ble Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh considered the petitioner's request and allowed the withdrawal. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn, with no further orders.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner may withdraw his anticipatory bail application

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • CrPC

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54206 of 2025
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-472 Year-2024 Thana- ARA NAWADA District- Bhojpur
                  ======================================================
                  Dhanji Yadav S/O Lal Bahadur Yadav Resident of Mohalla- Shital Tola, P.S.-
                  Ara Nawada, District- Bhojpur

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
             1.   The State of Bihar
             2.   Shashi Bhushan Mauaar S/O Late Ram Suresh Mauaar R/O Mohalla- New
                  Karman Tola Bus Stand, P.S.- Ara Nawada, Dist.- Bhojpur.

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner      :       Mr. Akash Keshav, Advocate
                  For the State           :       Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, APP
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
                                        ORAL ORDER

4    16-01-2026                  Heard Mr. Akash Keshav, learned counsel appearing

                    on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, learned

                    APP appearing on behalf of the State.

                                 2. After some arguments, learned counsel appearing

                    on behalf of the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this

                    anticipatory bail application.

                                 3. Permission, as prayed for, is accorded.

                                 4. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application

                    stands dismissed as withdrawn.



                                          (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
shashank/-
U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.