Patna High Court
KUNDAN KUMARversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR
- Decided
- Disposal
- ALLOWED
- Bench
- SANDEEP KUMAR
Holding
The court held that the allegations were mala‑fide and the prosecution an abuse of process, thereby quashing the order of cognizance and all consequent proceedings.
Summary
The petitioners filed an application seeking to quash the order of cognizance dated 1 July 2019 issued by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Masaurhi, which had taken cognizance of offences under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 341, 307, 504 and Arms Act section 27 in connection with a land‑dispute‑related incident at Pipra. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners threatened Sanju Devi with weapons, assaulted her and that Kundan Kumar fired at her, after which the accused fled. The petitioners contended that the FIR merely disguised a civil land dispute, that the sale deed was in their name, and that the case was a mala‑fide prosecution intended to falsely implicate them, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in *State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal*. The State opposed the application. After examining the material, the High Court held that the allegations were indeed mala‑fide, the complaint was concoced, and consequently quashed the order of cognizance and all consequent proceedings. The application was allowed.
Issues considered
- Whether the prosecution in the case is mala‑fide and constitutes an abuse of the judicial process.
- Whether the order of cognizance dated 1 July 2019 should be set aside and the proceedings quashed.
Legislation cited
- Arms Act — s. 27
- Indian Penal Code — s. 147, 148, 149, 307, 323, 341, 504
Subjects
- mala fide prosecution
- abuse of process
- quash of criminal proceeding
- land dispute
- false complaint
- Indian Penal Code
- Arms Act
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54625 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-32 Year-2019 Thana- PIPRA District- Patna
======================================================
KUNDAN KUMAR Son of Ajay Yadav Resident of Village- Behrawan,
Police Station- Pipra, District- Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. THE STATE OF BIHAR Bihar
2. Sanju Devi W/O- Rajundhari Kewat R/O- Behrawanp P.S- Pipra. Dist-
Patna.
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
with
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 54474 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-32 Year-2019 Thana- PIPRA District- Patna
======================================================
1. AJAY YADAV Son of Late Vishwanath Roy Resident of Village- Behrawan,
Police Station- Pipra, District- Patna.
2. Gulshan Kumar Son of Nawal Kishore Yadav Resident of Village-
Shekhpura, Police Station- Pipra, District- Patna.
3. Nitish Kumar Son of Vijay Singh Resident of Village- Pipra, Police Station-
Ram Krishna Nagar, District- Patna.
4. Tinku Kumar Son of Umesh Prasad Resident of Village- Pipra, Police
Station- Ram Krishna Nagar, District- Patna.
5. Ravi Ranjan Kumar Son of Sachchida Prasad Resident of Village- Sati
Asthan Masaurhi, Police Station- Masaurhi, District- Patna.
6. Pyare Arun Yadav @ prare yadav Son of Arun Yadav Resident of Village-
Paschim Sarira, Police Station- Manjhanpur, District- Kokshamvi (U.P.)
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. THE STATE OF BIHAR Bihar
2. Sanju Devi W/o Rajandhari Kewat, R/o Village-Behrawan, P.S.-Pipra,
District-Patna
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 54625 of 2019)
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ram Naresh Ray, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Jharkhandi Upadhayaya, APP
(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 54474 of 2019)
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ram Naresh Ray, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ram Bilash Roy Raman, APP
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54625 of 2019(4) dt.20-01-2026
2/4
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
4 20-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned
A.P.P. for the State.
2. This application has been filed on behalf of the
petitioners for setting aside/quashing the order of cognizance
dated 01.07.2019 by which the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist
Class, Masaurhi took cognizance under Sections 147, 148, 149,
323, 341, 307, 504 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of
the Arms Act against the petitioners in connection with Pipra
P.S. Case No. 32/2019.
3. As per the prosecution case, petitioners threatened
Sanju Devi with weapons over a land dispute, assaulted her
causing injuries and Ajay Yadav’s son Kundan Kumar fired at
her. When villagers arrived, the accused fled. Police
apprehended others while Ajay Yadav (petitioner no. 1) escaped.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that
from the reading of the FIR, it appears that a civil dispute has
been given a colour of criminal case and the sale deed is in the
name of the petitioner.
5. The learned counsel for the petitioners has relied
upon a judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court passed in the
case of State of Haryana & Ors v. Bhajan Lal & Ors, 1992
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54625 of 2019(4) dt.20-01-2026
3/4
Supp (1) SCC 335 and has submitted that the present
prosecution is a mala-fide one and the same is nothing but an
abuse of the process of the court.
6. Per-contra, the learned APP for the State has
opposed the application of the petitioners.
7 . The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Bhajan
Lal (Supra) has held that mala – fide prosecution should not be
allowed to continue.
8. On careful examination of the materials available
on record, this Court finds that the allegations against the
petitioners are mala-fide and the complaint has been filed by the
complainant against the petitioners in order to falsely implicate
them in a concocted case.
9 . Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances
of the case and the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme
Court in the case of Bhajan Lal (supra) , the application stands
allowed.
10 . Accordingly, the cognizance dated 01.07.2019
passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Masaurhi in
Pipra P.S. Case No. 32/2019 and all the consequential
proceedings arising out of the aforesaid case are hereby
quashed.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54625 of 2019(4) dt.20-01-2026
4/4
11 . Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand
disposed of.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
tusharika/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.