Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

SANTOSH PRASAD VERMAversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The application is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Santosh Prasad Verma, filed an application in Criminal Miscellaneous No.54815 of 2022 before the Patna High Court. During the hearing on 6 January 2026, the petitioner’s counsel requested that the application be withdrawn. The Court, after hearing the State’s counsel, granted permission for the withdrawal. Consequently, the application was dismissed as withdrawn. The Court also directed that the petitioner may pursue any other legal remedies available to him.

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54815 of 2022
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-237 Year-2021 Thana- FATEHPUR District- Gaya
                  ======================================================
                  Santosh Prasad Verma S/O Brijnandan Prasad @ Viraju Saw Resident Of
                  Village- Paharpur, P.O. And P.S.- Fatehpur, District- Gaya.

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
            1.    The State of Bihar
            2.    Shambhu Nath Verma @ Lalji S/O Late Babulal Shaw @ Babulal
                  Swarnakar Resident Of Village- Paharpur, P.O. And P.S.- Fatehpur, District-
                  Gaya.

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Md. Javed Jafar Khan, Advocate
                  For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Pawan Kumar Chaurasia, APP
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA
                                        ORAL ORDER

4    06-01-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                    APP for the State.

                                 2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the

                    petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present application.

                                 3. Permission is accorded.

                                 4. Accordingly, this application is dismissed as

                    withdrawn.

                                 5. Petitioner has also liberty to take other remedies

                    available in law.



                                               (Soni Shrivastava, J)
anand/-
U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.