Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Santosh Rai @ Santosh RayversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The application was dismissed as it had become infructuous.

Summary

Santosh Rai filed a criminal miscellaneous application before the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar. The petitioner, represented by Mr. Bijendra Kumar Singh, later informed the court that the application had become infructuous. The respondent, the State, was represented by Mr. Rajendra Singh Shastri, APP. The court considered the claim of infructuity raised by the petitioner. Relying on the petitioner's submission, the court dismissed the application as it was no longer capable of producing any relief. The order was pronounced by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar.

Subjects

  • infructuous
  • petition dismissed
  • criminal miscellaneous

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55325 of 2025
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-611 Year-2023 Thana- MADHAURAH District- Saran
                 ======================================================
                 Santosh Rai @ Santosh Ray son of Deep Narayan Rai @ Dipnarayan Ray
                 Village- Gaura Bawan, Bichala Tola, Ps- Madhaurah, dist- Saran At chapra

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr.Bijendra Kumar Singh, Adv
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr.Rajendra Singh Shastri, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   10-02-2026                    Heard the parties.

                                2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this

                   application has become infructuous.

                                3. Accordingly, the same is dismissed as having

                   become infructuous.



                                              (Sandeep Kumar, J)
N.K/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.