Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Mahesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted regular bail to the petitioner.

Summary

Mahesh Kumar was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 109(1), 3(5) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act after allegedly firing at an informant, causing a leg injury. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated, citing a land dispute and a prior case lodged by his brother against members of the prosecution. The State opposed his bail, arguing the seriousness of the offences. The court examined the nature of the injury, the claim of false implication, and the circumstances of the incident. It ordered the release of the petitioner on regular bail with a bond of Rs.10,000 and two sureties, subject to his cooperation with the trial. The order also required the petitioner to appear as directed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail should be granted to the accused in offences under Sections 109(1), 3(5) of the BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
  • Whether the claim of false implication and the nature of the injury justify bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • regular bail
  • Arms Act
  • Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act
  • false implication
  • land dispute
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5548 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-119 Year-2024 Thana- Singhaul District- Begusarai
                 ======================================================
                 Mahesh Kumar Son of Sri Rambalak Singh Resident Of Village- Ramdiri
                 Nakti Tola No 5 P.s- Matihani District -Begusarai

                                                                                      ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :         Mr.Ajay Kr. Thakur, Adv.
                                                    Mrs.Vaishnavi Singh, Adv.
                                                    Mr.Ritwik Thakur, Adv.
                 For the State            :         Mr.Madhura Nand Jha, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR
                 PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   16-02-2026                           Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as

                   learned APP for the State.

                                    2. In this case, the petitioner is seeking regular bail in

                   connection with Singhaul P.S. Case No. 119 of 2024, registered for

                   the offences punishable under Sections 109(1), 3(5) of the BNS and

                   27 of Arms Act.

                                    3. On 25.08.2024 at about 09:30 A.M., while the

                   informant was returning to his village with his friend Sachin Kumar

                   on a motorcycle, the accused persons including the petitioner

                   intercepted them near Itwa H.P.S. School. On refusal to stop the

                   motorcycle, the petitioner fired at the informant, causing a gunshot

                   injury to his right leg, and co-accused Ranjeet Kumar also fired at his

                   head but missed. Thereafter, the accused persons fled away and the
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5548 of 2026(2) dt.16-02-2026
                                                       2/2




                     injured was taken to Sadar Hospital, Begusarai for treatment.

                                   4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted

                     that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated. Both

                     the parties are agnates. The injuries on the person of the injured

                     though caused by fire arm, but simple in nature, according to opinion

                     of the doctor. Learned counsel has submitted further that there is land

                     dispute between the parties and the petitioner is under custody since

                     13.11.2025. Few days prior to the occurrence, according to

                     submission of the learned counsel, brother of the petitioner had

                     lodged a case against the members of the prosecution side.

                                   5. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has

                     opposed the prayer for bail.

                                     6.   Considering        the   above-mentioned   facts   and

                     circumstances, let the petitioner above-named be released on bail on

                     furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like

                     amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial

                     Magistrate-IV, Begusarai in connection with Singhaul P.S. Case No.

                     119 of 2024, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall

                     cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and

                     when required by the court.


                                          (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)

kundan/-
U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.