Patna High Court
Rakesh Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- JITENDRA KUMAR
Holding
The High Court held that bail may be granted to the petitioner, subject to a cash bond, sureties and conditions imposed under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S 2023.
Summary
The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar Sah, was charged in a complaint dated 15‑09‑2023 for offences under IPC sections 406, 324, 504, 498A, 323 and 379 arising from alleged marital cruelty and illicit relationship. He pleaded innocence, claimed no prior criminal record and asserted that the case stemmed from marital discord. The State opposed bail, while the petitioner sought regular bail having not applied for anticipatory bail earlier. The Patna High Court, after considering the facts and the petitioner’s clean record, granted bail subject to a bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties and conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S 2023. The Court also directed the parties to attempt social reconciliation and, failing that, allowed the wife to file a matrimonial petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act for restitution of conjugal rights, maintenance and child custody.
Issues considered
- Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner despite serious charges under IPC sections 406, 324, 504, 498A, 323 and 379.
- Whether the petitioner’s claim of no prior criminal antecedents and lack of earlier bail applications affect the bail decision.
- Whether the High Court can impose conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S 2023 while granting bail.
Legislation cited
- B.N.S.S. Act, 2023 — s. 482(2)
- Hindu Marriage Act — s. 9
- Indian Penal Code — s. 323, 324, 379, 406, 498A, 504
Subjects
- bail
- IPC
- marital cruelty
- Section 482
- High Court
- anticipatory bail
- Hindu Marriage Act
- restoration of conjugal rights
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.559 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2593 Year-2023 Thana- EAST CHAMPARAN COMPLAINT
District- East Champaran
======================================================
Rakesh Kumar Sah, S/o Late Ramnath Sah, R/o vill - Chakbara Bakhari, P.S.-
Pipra, Distt.- East Champaran, Motihari, at present address Fatashi, MB
Road, Guhati-9, P.S- Bharlumukh, Kamrup Asam
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Sumitra Devi, W/o Rakesh Kumar Sah, D/o Rajesh Sah, R/o vill - Amaw,
P.s.- Banjariya, Distt.- East- Champaran, Motihari.
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate.
For the State : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 28-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail, apprehending his arrest,
in connection with Complaint Case No. 2593 of 2023 dated
15.09.2023 filed for the offences punishable under Sections 406,
324, 504, 498A and 323/379 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per allegation, marriage between the petitioner
and the Complainant/wife was solemnized in the year 2015 and
she was treated well for five years but in the year 2020, the
petitioner/husband has developed illicit relationship with
another lady living in the same building and on protest by her,
she was subjected to cruelty. However, she is ready to live with
her husband/petitioner if she would be treated well.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.559 of 2026(2) dt.28-01-2026
2/3
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
Petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this
case. He further submits that as a matter of fact, there is some
misunderstanding on account of suspicion and, hence, the
matrimonial life is running into rough weather. However, the
petitioner is willing to keep his wife along with his three
children who are living with his wife at her Maike.
5. It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the bail
petition that the petitioner has not moved this Court earlier
either for anticipatory bail or regular one in the instant case.
6. It has further been stated in paragraph no.3 of the
bail petition that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents.
7. However, learned APP for the State vehemently
opposes the prayer of the Petitioner for bail.
8. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances,
this petition is allowed, directing the petitioner, above-named,
to be enlarged on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender
before the court below within a period of eight weeks from the
date of receipt / production of a copy of this order, on his
furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs.10,000 /- (Ten Thousand)
with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of
learned concerned court below in connection with Complaint
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.559 of 2026(2) dt.28-01-2026
3/3
Case No. 2593 of 2023 subject to the conditions as laid down
under Section 482 (2) of the B.N.S.S 2023, and on the
following conditions:
(i) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court
below that the petitioner has any criminal antecedent, learned
court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner after
hearing him and getting satisfied that the petitioner has
concealed his criminal antecedents despite his knowledge of the
same.
(ii) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court
below that statement regarding previous bail petition is wrong,
learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.
9. However, the parties are directed to take social
initiative to get the matter settled and in case, the matter is not
settled, the Complainant/wife has liberty to file matrimonial
petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act for
restitution of conjugal rights as well as maintenance and custody
of child.
(Jitendra Kumar, J)
S.Ali/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.