Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ram Vinay SahversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court permitted the withdrawal of the application and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.

Summary

Ram Vinay Sah and Bare Sah filed a petition in a criminal miscellaneous case arising from a complaint in Sitamarhi. They sought the court's permission to withdraw their application. The State of Bihar, represented by an Additional Public Prosecutor, opposed the withdrawal. The learned counsel for the petitioners requested permission to withdraw, which the court considered. The court granted the request, allowing the withdrawal, and consequently dismissed the petition as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether the court may grant permission to withdraw the petitioner's application

Subjects

  • withdrawal of application
  • criminal miscellaneous proceedings
  • petition dismissed

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5592 of 2024
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-284 Year-2022 Thana- SITAMARHI COMPLAINT CASE
                                                    District- Sitamarhi
                 ======================================================
           1.     Ram Vinay Sah S/o Ramyash Sah R/o Sirasi, P.S. - Nanpur, Dist. - Sitamarhi
           2.    Bare Sah S/o Ramyash Sah R/o Sirasi, P.S. - Nanpur, Dist. - Sitamarhi

                                                                             ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar Bihar
           2.    Ram Umesh Choudhary S/o Late Ram Sogarrh Choudhary R/o Vill -
                 Rasulganj @ Koyali, P.S. - Manpur, Dist. - Sitamarhi At present residing at
                 Muhalla - Rajbagh, P.S. - Puprai, Dist. - Sitamarhi

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Rudal Singh, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Rajendra Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   27-01-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners

                   seek permission to withdraw this application.

                                3. Permission is accorded.

                                4. As prayed for, the petition stands dismissed as

                   withdrawn.



                                              (Sourendra Pandey, J)
Gautam/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.