Patna High Court
Sikandar Dubey @ Sikandar DiwvediversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
- Bench
- PRAVEEN KUMAR
Holding
The Court dismissed the application as withdrawn, granting the petitioner liberty to raise his grounds at a later stage.
Summary
The petitioner, Sikandar Dubey, filed an application in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding. The petitioner’s counsel sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the application while retaining the liberty to raise all grounds at a later stage of the trial. The Court considered the request and granted permission for the withdrawal. Consequently, the application was dismissed as withdrawn, with the petitioner free to raise his grounds later. The Court expressly clarified that it did not express any opinion on the merits of the underlying case.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the application at this stage of the proceedings?
Subjects
- withdrawal of application
- procedural law
- criminal miscellaneous proceedings
- court discretion
- no merits decided
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.572 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-61 Year-2012 Thana- DHAKA District- East Champaran
======================================================
Sikandar Dubey @ Sikandar Diwvedi S/o- Late Umesh Dubey Vill-Kaswa,
P.S-Dhaka, Dist-West Champaran
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Vikash Kumar Dubey S/o- Sri Devendra Dubey Village- Barharwas Lakhan
Sen Ps- Dhaka Dist- East Champaran
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Binay Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ahmad Ali, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 13-03-2026 Heard the parties.
2. At the very outset, the learned counsel for
petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with
liberty to the petitioner to raise all the grounds at an appropriate
stage in the trial.
3. Permission is accorded.
4. Accordingly, the present application is dismissed as
withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty to the petitioner.
5. It is clarified that this Court has not expressed any
opinion on the merits of the case.
(Praveen Kumar, J)
Jyoti/-
U T
Checking your session…