Patna High Court
Rintu khan @ Tintu khan @ Minhaj AhmedversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- PRAVEEN KUMAR
Holding
The court permitted the withdrawal and disposed of the application as withdrawn.
Summary
The petitioner, Rintu Khan (also known as Tintu Khan and Minhaj Ahmed), filed an application in the Patna High Court seeking to withdraw the pending criminal miscellaneous application so that he could raise all points, including those related to the framing of charge, at the appropriate stage. The State of Bihar and Khusboo Khatoon were opposite parties. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Mazharul Hassan, requested permission to withdraw the application. Justice Praveen Kumar granted the permission, ordering that the application be treated as withdrawn. The court expressly clarified that it did not express any opinion on the merits of the underlying criminal case. Consequently, the application was disposed of as withdrawn.
Issues considered
- Whether the court may permit the petitioner to withdraw the pending application and dispose of it without adjudicating the merits?
Subjects
- withdrawal of application
- criminal procedure
- charge framing
- court order
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57250 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2 Year-2019 Thana- NASRIGANJ District- Rohtas
======================================================
Rintu khan @ Tintu khan @ Minhaj Ahmed Son of Seraj Khan @ Seraj
Ahmad R/o Village - Hariharganj, Ward no. 12, P.S. - Nasriganj, Dist. -
Rohtas.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Khusboo Khatoon D/o Md. Akhtar Kuraisi R/o VIllage - Hariharganj, Ward
no. 12, P.S. - Nasriganj, Dist. - Rohtas.
... ... Opposite Parties
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Mazharul Hassan
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Md. Fahimuddin
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 17-03-2026 Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset,
prays for withdrawal of this application so as to raise all the
points available to him including the ground raised in this
application at the time of framing of charge.
2. Permission is granted.
3. This application is disposed of as withdrawn with
the liberty aforesaid.
4. It is made clear that this court has not expressed
any opinion on the merits of the case.
(Praveen Kumar, J)
Pawan/-
U T
Checking your session…