Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Deepak KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted bail to the petitioner subject to bond and conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. and Section 482(2) BNSS.

Summary

The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, was named in an FIR for alleged assault with a knife, grievous hurt, and attempt to murder of the informant's daughter, stemming from a dispute over a three‑year live‑in relationship. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the case was false, citing a radiological report showing no brain injury, and asserted his clean antecedents. The State opposed bail, emphasizing the seriousness of the offences under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307 and 379 of the IPC. The Court examined the medical evidence and the nature of the allegations, finding reasonable doubt about the grievous nature of the injury. Consequently, the Court ordered the petitioner’s release on bail, subject to a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and conditions under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted in a case involving alleged assault, grievous hurt and attempt to murder.
  • Whether the medical report negates the existence of grievous injury and thus weakens the prosecution’s case.
  • Whether the alleged motive of a false complaint due to a disapproved live‑in relationship warrants bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • assault
  • attempt to murder
  • live‑in relationship
  • false complaint
  • medical evidence
  • Indian Penal Code
  • Criminal Procedure Code

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57724 of 2024
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-41 Year-2018 Thana- NOORSARAI District- Nalanda
                 ======================================================
                 Deepak Kumar son of Pramod Kumar Village- Barh Po- gali Infront of
                 Railway Station Barh Ps- Barh Dist- Patna
                                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                   Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                              ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh, Adv
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Navin Kr. Pandey, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

5   02-02-2026                   Heard the parties.

                                2. The petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and

                   apprehending his arrest in connection with Noorsarai P.S. Case No.

                   41 of 2018 registered for the offences punishable under Sections

                   341, 323, 324, 307 and 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

                                3. As per FIR, petitioner who was in live in relationship

                   with daughter of informant for long 3 years, when on one occasion

                   after returning from Delhi approaching Rajgir, on the way

                   assaulted the daughter of informant by using knife with an

                   intention to cause her death.

                                4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on

                   behalf of the petitioner that informant was not happy with the

                   relationship of petitioner with her daughter and in want of approval

                   of said relationship, the present false case was lodged without
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57724 of 2024(5) dt.02-02-2026
                                            2/3




          having any cogent material. It is also submitted that allegation of

          assault is appearing false on its face as upon radiological

          examination of brain of injured daughter of informant, it appears

          that “brain parenchyma appears normal in density and

          morphology, no focal lesion seen neither any mass effect

          nor     midline      shift noticed        besides    brainstream    and

          cerebellum appears normal and no fracture was seen in

          bone window setting” suggesting sufficiently that there was no

          injury as alleged and if it is so, prima-facie not grievous in nature

          negating intention of petitioner to cause death of daughter of the

          informant. While concluding argument, it is submitted that

          petitioner is a man of clean antecedent.

                        5. Learned APP opposes the prayer of bail.

                       6. In view of aforesaid factual submission and by taking

          note of nature of accusations as petitioner was in live-in

          relationship for long three years with daughter of informant, where

          nature of injury also creates a doubt, qua allegation of assault,

          accordingly petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or

          surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks, is

          directed to be released on bail,              furnishing bail bond of Rs.

          10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like

          amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Nalanda, Bihar
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57724 of 2024(5) dt.02-02-2026
                                                           3/3




                         Sharif/concerned Court, where the case is pending in connection

                         with Noorsarai P.S. Case No. 41 of 2018, subject to the conditions

                         as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C/ Section 482(2)

                         of BNSS.


                                                                 (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)
S.Tripathi/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.