Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Raju SinghversusThe State Of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISS FOR NON-PROSECUTION

Holding

The application is dismissed for non‑prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear.

Summary

Petitioner Raju Singh filed an application in the Patna High Court but did not appear for hearing despite two calls. The State and the informant’s counsel were present. The Court observed that the petitioner was not interested in pursuing the application. Consequently, the Court dismissed the application on the ground of non‑prosecution. No merits were examined.

Subjects

  • non-prosecution
  • application dismissal
  • court procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58325 of 2025
                                              In
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83572 of 2024
                 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-619 Year-2023 Thana- ROHTAS COMPLAINT CASE District-
                                                         Rohtas
                 ======================================================
                 Raju Singh S/O Ram Dular Singh Resident of village- Rupi, P.S.- Dinara,
                 District- Rohtas at Sasaram
                                                                      ... ... Petitioner/s
                                               Versus

           1.    The State Of Bihar
           2.    Mithilesh Kumar Son of Late Bhola Singh Resident of village- Mainpura,
                 Post- Mahuari, P.S.- Kochas, District- Rohtas at Sasaram

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :     None
                 For the Opposite Party/s :     Mr. Pranav Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
                                       ORAL ORDER

5   09-01-2026                    No one appears on behalf of the petitioner even in

                   the second call. Learned counsel for the State and learned

                   counsel for the informant are present.

                                2. It transpires to this Court that the petitioner is not

                   interested to pursue this application.

                                3. Therefore, the present application stands dismissed

                   due to non-prosecution.



                                                                  (Dr. Anshuman, J.)

Aman Kumar/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.