Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Himanshu Singh @ Himansdhu Singh @ BabluversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to surrender, bail bond, sureties and a condition not to indulge in similar offences.

Summary

The petitioner, Himanshu Singh, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in a case (PS Case No. 280 of 2025) under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, where his name appeared only in the confessional statements of co‑accused Sanjay Ram and Akshay Kumar. He asserted innocence, claiming no possession of liquor and no direct evidence against him. The State opposed bail, highlighting the petitioner’s two pending criminal cases for which he is already on bail. After hearing both sides, the court granted anticipatory bail, directing the petitioner to surrender within four weeks and to furnish a bail bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties, imposing a condition that he not commit similar offences, under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail can be granted when the petitioner’s alleged involvement is based solely on co‑accused confessional statements.
  • Whether the petitioner’s prior criminal antecedents and existing bail in other cases preclude the grant of anticipatory bail.
  • Whether the conditions imposed under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. are appropriate and sufficient.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act
  • confessional statement
  • prior criminal antecedent
  • bail conditions
  • Section 482(2) B.N.S.S.

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5837 of 2026
                 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-280 Year-2025 Thana- DURGAWATI District- Kaimur (Bhabua)
                 ======================================================
                 Himanshu Singh @ Himansdhu Singh @ Bablu S/o Late Bahadur Singh R/o
                 Village- Lakhanu Sarai, PS- Sasaram Town, or Darigaon, Dist- Rohtas


                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar


                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Babu Nandan Prasad, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Damodar Prasad Tiwary, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   09-02-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The instant application for anticipatory bail has

                   been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in

                   connection with Durgawati P.S. Case No. 280 of 2025 instituted

                   for the offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition &

                   Excise Act.

                                3. The case of the prosecution in short is that the name

                   of this petitioner has surfaced in the confessional statement of

                   co-accused namely, Sanjay Ram who was apprehended on

                   bolero vehicle and from the said vehicle, 397.90 liters of

                   country-made foreign liquor was recovered.

                                4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5837 of 2026(2) dt.09-02-2026
                                            2/3




          petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has

          committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this

          case. He also submits that nothing has been recovered from the

          possession of this petitioner. The name of this petitioner has

          surfaced only in the confessional statement of co-accused

          namely, Sanjay Ram and Akshay Kumar.

                       5. In contra, learned APP appearing for the State has

          opposed the prayer of bail of the petitioners and submits that the

          petitioner is having criminal antecedent of two cases where he is

          on bail in those cases.

                       6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in

          the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this

          Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail with a

          condition that the petitioner shall not indulge in similar

          nature of offences in future. The petitioner is directed to

          surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from

          today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection

          with Durgawati P.S. Case No. 280 of 2025, he will be enlarged

          on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten

          thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

          satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise-II, Kaimur at

          Bhabhua subject to the conditions as laid down under section
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5837 of 2026(2) dt.09-02-2026
                                                       3/3




                     482(2) of the B.N.S.S.



                                                    (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
Sudhanshu/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.