Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Chandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that the allegations were general and omnibus, and therefore bail was warranted.

Summary

Chandan Kumar was named in an FIR for offences under Sections 498A, 341, 323, 506, 34 of the IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act, alleged to have subjected his wife to mental and physical cruelty for not paying a dowry demand of Rs. 20 lakh. The petitioner argued that the allegations were vague, that a family court case on maintenance was pending, and that he was already paying Rs. 18,000 as interim maintenance. The State contended that the petitioner had forced his wife and child into destitution and was not complying with the family court order. The court examined the prima facie nature of the allegations and found them to be general and omnibus, concluding that bail could be granted. Accordingly, the petitioner was released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

Issues considered

  • Whether the prima facie case under Sections 498A, 341, 323, 506, 34 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act is sufficient to deny bail.
  • Whether the pending family court maintenance proceedings affect the bail application.
  • Whether the allegations of mental and physical cruelty are specific enough to justify denial of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • dowry harassment
  • mental cruelty
  • physical cruelty
  • maintenance
  • family court
  • IPC
  • Section 498A
  • Criminal Procedure Code

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59051 of 2024
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-58 Year-2022 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Nalanda
                 ======================================================
                 Chandan Kumar S/o- Suresh Prasad Village- Halimpur, P. S. - Nayaramnagar,
                 District- Munger
                                                                           ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                 Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                    ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Narsingh Tanti, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Navin Kr. Pandey, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   02-02-2026                    Heard the parties.

                                2. The petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and

                   apprehending his arrest in connection with Mahila P.S. Case

                   No. 58 of 2022 registered for the offences punishable under

                   Sections 498A, 341, 323, 506, 34 of IPC and Section ¾ DP

                   Act.

                                3. The allegation against petitioner is to commit

                   mental and physical cruelty upon informant/ O.P. No. 2 due to

                   non-fulfillment of demand of dowry as raised for cash of Rs.

                   20 lakh.

                                4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on

                   behalf of the petitioner that in fact out of temperamental

                   issues, the informant/ O.P. No. 2, is not willing to continue
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59051 of 2024(4) dt.02-02-2026
                                            2/3




          her marital relation with petitioner. It is submitted that for

          maintenance issue the matter is pending before learned

          family court, where as interim measure the petitioner is

          regularly paying Rs. 18,000/- as maintenance. It is also

          submitted that the petitioner is facing general and omnibus

          allegation qua committing mental and physical cruelty and the

          amount which alleged to be paid to this petitioner was in

          actually paid to his elder brother out of professional

          relationship between him and the father of the informant.

          While concluding argument, it is submitted that petitioner

          claimed clean antecedent.

                       5 Learned APP duly assisted by learned counsel for

          the informant while opposing the prayer of bail submitted that

          the allegation is specific against this petitioner being husband

          and he forced informant and her child to live in destitution as

          he is not even paying maintenance to them, in terms of

          learned family court order.

                       6. Taking note of aforesaid submission, learned

          counsel for the petitioner submitted that if it is so as the

          matter is pending before the learned family court, the
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59051 of 2024(4) dt.02-02-2026
                                                           3/3




                         informant/ O.P. No. 2 may approach there by filing

                         appropriate petition/ execution, if so advised.

                                       7. In view of aforesaid factual submission and by

                         taking note of fact as prima-facie allegation qua committing

                         mental and physical cruelty against petitioner appearing very

                         general and omnibus in nature, accordingly petitioner above-

                         named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court

                         below within a period of four weeks, is directed to be released

                         on bail, furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten

                         Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

                         satisfaction of the learned SDJM, Nalanda at Biharsharif

                         /concerned Court, where the case is pending in connection

                         with Mahila P.S. Case No. 58 of 2022, subject to the

                         conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C/

                         Section 482(2) of BNSS.


                                                                   (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)
S.Tripathi/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.