Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Rajendra Mandal @ Rajendra Kumar MandalversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioners subject to conditions, finding no sufficient ground to deny bail.

Summary

Three individuals were arrested during a police raid on a Maruti Swift; no narcotics were found in the vehicle and the accused could not explain their presence. Subsequently, 182.360 kg of ganja was recovered from the embankment of the Koshi River, an open area not under the control of the accused. The petitioners argued they were falsely implicated, had no possession of the contraband, and possessed clean antecedents, seeking bail under the NDPS Act. The State opposed bail, emphasizing the large (commercial) quantity of the seized narcotics. The court, noting the absence of any recovery from the accused’s conscious possession and their clean records, granted bail with a Rs.10,000 bond and specific conditions, stating that the order does not affect the trial.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail can be granted to accused under the NDPS Act when no narcotic substance is found in their possession
  • Whether the commercial quantity of the seized narcotics precludes the grant of bail

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • NDPS Act
  • bail
  • commercial quantity
  • false implication
  • clean antecedent
  • drug trafficking
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
            CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85844 of 2025
      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-51 Year-2025 Thana- Bhimnagar District- Supaul
======================================================
Dashrath Kumar Singh @ Dashrath Singh, S/o Bhimshankar Singh, R/o
Village - Rampur, Ward No. 1, P.S - Balua Bazar, District - Supaul

                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                       Versus
The State of Bihar

                                       ... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
                                         with
             CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 589 of 2026
      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-51 Year-2025 Thana- Bhimnagar District- Supaul
======================================================
Aklesh Mandal @ Akhilesh Mandal @ Abhay Mandal, Son of Bhagwat
Mandal @ Bhagbat Mandal, Resident of village - Koshi Baraj, Ward No.- 01.
Hanuman Nagar, Kankalani Nagarpalika, P.S.- Bhardah, District - Saptari
(Nepal)

                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                       Versus
The State of Bihar

                                       ... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
                                         with
             CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 592 of 2026
      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-51 Year-2025 Thana- Bhimnagar District- Supaul
======================================================
Rajendra Mandal @ Rajendra Kumar Mandal, Son of Inar Mandal @ Inar
Mandal Rajdhob, Resident of Village - Koshi Baraj, Ward No.- 01, Hanuman
Nagar, Kankalani Nagarpalika, P.S.- Bhardah, District - Saptari (Nepal)

                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                       Versus
The State of Bihar

                                       ... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 85844 of 2025)
For the Petitioner/s     : Mr. Naresh Kumar Mehta, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, APP
(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 589 of 2026)
For the Petitioner/s     : Mr. Y.C. Verma, Sr. Advocate
                           Mr. Arvind Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Navin Kumar Pandey, APP
(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 592 of 2026)
         Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85844 of 2025(2) dt.09-01-2026
                                                     2/5




                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Y.C. Verma, Sr. Advocate
                                                  Mr. Arvind Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Navin Kumar Pandey, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   09-01-2026                   Since all the bail applications are arising out of the

                   same P.S. case, they are being disposed off with a common

                   order.

                                 2. Heard Mr. Y.C. Verma, learned Senior counsel for

                   the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                 3. Petitioners, who are in custody, seeks bail in

                   connection with Bhim Nagar P.S. Case No. 51 of 2025

                   registered for the offences punishable under Sections 8/20(b)(ii)

                   (c)/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act,

                   1985.

                                 4. As per the prosecution case, on secret information

                   the police conducted a raid and intercepted a Maruti Swift car

                   and apprehended three persons, namely, Dashrath Kumar Singh

                   @ Dashrath Singh (petitioner), Aklesh Mandal @ Akhilesh

                   Mandal @ Abhay Mandal (petitioner) and Rajendra Mandal @

                   Rajendra Kumar Mandal (petitioner). On search nothing was

                   found in the vehicle neither the three apprehended persons

                   would state as to why they were present there. It is further

                   alleged that after a hectic search total 182.360 kg of Ganja was

                   recovered from the embankment of Koshi river hidden under the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85844 of 2025(2) dt.09-01-2026
                                            3/5




          water.

                       5. The learned senior counsel for the petitioners

          submits that they have been falsely implicated in this case and

          they have no concern whatsoever with the alleged recovered

          illicit Ganja. It has next been submitted that admittedly the

          Ganja recovered from the riverside water's bush, and the same

          was found submerged in the water and is an open place

          accessible by all. It has also been submitted that nothing was

          recovered from the car in which the petitioners were traveling

          and most importantly the seizure list does not contain the

          signature of the petitioners. It has further been submitted that it

          is also not the case of the prosecution that it was on the pointing

          of the petitioners, the said consignment was recovered. It has,

          thus, been submitted that in view of the articles not being

          recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners and

          the petitioners having clean antecedent they may be released on

          bail. It has lastly been submitted that the petitioners are in

          custody since 08.07.2025.

                       6. The learned A.P.P. has vehemently opposed the

          prayer for bail and has stated that total 182.360 kg of contraband

          was recovered, which was a huge consignment and it falls under

          the commercial quantity as per the NDPS Act.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85844 of 2025(2) dt.09-01-2026
                                            4/5




                       7. Considering the aforesaid submissions made by the

          parties and taking into account the clean antecedents as well as

          the fact that no recovery was made from the conscious

          possession, let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail

          on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each

          with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

          the learned court below where the case is pending/successor

          court in connection with Bhim Nagar P.S. Case No. 51 of 2025,

          subject to the following conditions:-

                                       (i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall
                          be their close relative and the other shall be local
                          resident.
                                       (ii) The petitioners shall remain physically
                          present in Court on each date of the trial.
                                       (iii) In case of absence on two consecutive
                          dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail
                          bond of the petitioners will be liable to be cancelled by
                          the court concerned.
                                       (iv) If the petitioners are found involved in
                          similar nature of offence in future, the prosecution shall
                          be at liberty to move for cancellation of their bail bond.
                                       (v) The learned Court below shall verify the
                          criminal antecedent of the petitioners and in case at any
                          stage it is found that the petitioners have concealed
                          their criminal antecedent, the court below shall take
                          step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioners.
                          However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the
                          above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85844 of 2025(2) dt.09-01-2026
                                                          5/5




                                        of or in the name of verification.

                                     8. Accordingly, the prayer for bail is allowed.

                                     9. It is made clear that the observation, if any, made in

                        this order, shall be of no bearing during the trial.



                                                 (Sourendra Pandey, J)
manoj/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.