Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Surendra YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted provisional anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to a bail bond, sureties, a demand draft of Rs 2 lakhs, and a one‑year repayment schedule of the alleged advance.

Summary

The petitioner, Surendra Yadav, feared arrest in a criminal case (Jam​alpur P.S. Case No. 06 of 2024) involving alleged offences under several IPC sections for taking an advance of Rs 17 lakhs from the opposite party, Manoj Kumar Yadav, for a land transaction. The petitioner claimed innocence and offered to return the entire amount if the land was vacated. The High Court, after hearing counsel, allowed the anticipatory bail application, directing the petitioner to furnish a bail bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties and a demand draft of Rs 2 lakhs payable to the opposite party. The court further conditioned the bail on the petitioner’s repayment of the remaining Rs 15 lakhs in equal monthly instalments within one year, failing which further orders may be passed. The order was made under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and Section 482 of the BNSS, and the bail was to be confirmed by the lower court after compliance.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail can be granted under Section 438 CrPC to a person accused of multiple IPC offences including fraud and criminal intimidation.
  • Whether the court may impose monetary conditions, such as a demand draft and repayment schedule, as part of anticipatory bail.
  • Whether the court can invoke Section 482 of the BNSS to regulate the bail conditions in a civil‑financial dispute.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Section 438 CrPC
  • Section 482 BNSS
  • Indian Penal Code offences
  • land dispute
  • advance money
  • bail conditions
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59729 of 2025
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-6 Year-2024 Thana- JAMALPUR District- Darbhanga
                 ======================================================
                 Surendra Yadav S/o Bachhu Yadav R/o Village - Kiratpur, P.S - Jamalpur ,
                 District - Darbhanga (Bihar)

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar Bihar
           2.    Manoj Kumar Yadav S/o Shyam Sundar Yadav R/o Village - Kiratpur, P.S -
                 Jamalpur , District - Darbhanga (Bihar)

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Madan Mohan
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr.Ram Anurag Singh
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

7   20-02-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                   2.         The petitioner apprehends his arrest in

                   connection with Jamalpur P.S. Case No. 06 of 2024 registered

                   for the offence under Sections 323, 341, 385, 420, 467, 468,

                   471, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

                                   3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is

                   alleged to have taken an advance of Rs. 17 lakhs from the

                   opposite party no. 02 for registration of a land.

                                   4. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for

                   the petitioner that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely

                   been implicated in this case. He further submits, on instructions
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59729 of 2025(7) dt.20-02-2026
                                            2/3




          from the petitioner, that the petitioner is ready to return the

          entire amount of Rs. 17,00,000/- to the opposite party no. 02

          provided the opposite party no. 02 vacates the land which are

          subject matter of the sale deed.

                          5. Considering the aforesaid facts, this application

          is allowed.

                          6. Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of

          his arrest or surrender before the concerned Court below within

          four weeks from today, be released on provisional anticipatory

          bail for a period of one year on furnishing bail bond of Rs.

          10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

          each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1 st

          Class, Biraul/concerned Court below in connection with

          Jamalpur P.S. Case No. 06 of 2024, subject to the conditions

          laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure,

          1973 / Section 482 of the BNSS, subject to the condition that he

          will return the entire alleged amount to have been taken by him

          from the opposite party no. 02.

                       7. It is made clear that the bail bonds of the petitioner

          shall only be accepted if he brings a demand draft of Rs. 2 lakhs

          in the name of the opposite party no. 02 at the time of furnishing

          his bail bonds. Once the petitioner is released on provisional
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59729 of 2025(7) dt.20-02-2026
                                                      3/3




                    anticipatory bail, he will pay the entire balance amount of Rs

                    15,00,000/- within one year in equal monthly installments to the

                    opposite party no. 02 and thereafter his provisional bail shall be

                    confirmed by the court below itself. If the petitioner fails to pay

                    the entire amount to the opposite party no. 02 within one year

                    then appropriate orders shall be passed by the court below.



                                                            (Sandeep Kumar, J)
Vikas/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.