Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Md. Waquar Rajja YunusversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The Court permitted the withdrawal of the application and disposed of it without addressing the merits.

Summary

The petitioners, Md. Waquar Rajja Yunus and Dr. Rahmat Yunus, filed an application in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding against the State of Bihar and Sajjad Ahmad. The petitioners, through senior counsel, sought to withdraw the application, stating they would pursue their grievance elsewhere. The Court, after hearing counsel, granted permission to withdraw the application. The application was disposed of as withdrawn, with the Court expressly stating that it did not express any opinion on the merits. Consequently, the proceedings were halted without any substantive adjudication.

Issues considered

  • Whether the Court should permit the withdrawal of the pending application?

Subjects

  • withdrawal of application
  • procedural
  • criminal miscellaneous
  • court order

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60028 of 2025
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-92 Year-2005 Thana- KOTWALI District- Patna
                 ======================================================
           1.     Md. Waquar Rajja Yunus S/O Md. Yunus Resident of Mohalla- S.P. Verma
                  Road, Yunus Compound, P.S.- Kotwali, Dist.- Patna
           2.    Dr. Rahmat Yunus D/O Md. Yunus Resident of Mohalla- S.P. Verma Road,
                 Yunus Compound, P.S.- Kotwali, Dist.- Patna
                                                                      ... ... Petitioners
                                                 Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.     Sajjad Ahmad S/O Late Abdul Jaleel R/O Vill.- Mahmoodpur, P.O.- Halai,
                  P.S.- Tajpur, Dist.- Samastipur
                                                                   ... ... Opposite Parties
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s    :         Mr. Kaushal Kumar Jha, Senior Advocate
                                                   Mr. Siddharth Aditya, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party-State:     Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   06-04-2026                      Learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioners, at the very outset, submits that he would be agitating

                   his grievance before appropriate forum at appropriate stage and

                   as such prays for withdrawal of this application.

                                 2. Permission is granted.
                                 3. This application is disposed of as withdrawn with
                   the liberty aforesaid.
                                 4. It is made clear that this court has not expressed

                   any opinion on the merits of the case.



                                                 (Praveen Kumar, J)
Pawan/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.