Patna High Court
Md. Waquar Rajja YunusversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- PRAVEEN KUMAR
Holding
The Court permitted the withdrawal of the application and disposed of it without addressing the merits.
Summary
The petitioners, Md. Waquar Rajja Yunus and Dr. Rahmat Yunus, filed an application in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding against the State of Bihar and Sajjad Ahmad. The petitioners, through senior counsel, sought to withdraw the application, stating they would pursue their grievance elsewhere. The Court, after hearing counsel, granted permission to withdraw the application. The application was disposed of as withdrawn, with the Court expressly stating that it did not express any opinion on the merits. Consequently, the proceedings were halted without any substantive adjudication.
Issues considered
- Whether the Court should permit the withdrawal of the pending application?
Subjects
- withdrawal of application
- procedural
- criminal miscellaneous
- court order
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60028 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-92 Year-2005 Thana- KOTWALI District- Patna
======================================================
1. Md. Waquar Rajja Yunus S/O Md. Yunus Resident of Mohalla- S.P. Verma
Road, Yunus Compound, P.S.- Kotwali, Dist.- Patna
2. Dr. Rahmat Yunus D/O Md. Yunus Resident of Mohalla- S.P. Verma Road,
Yunus Compound, P.S.- Kotwali, Dist.- Patna
... ... Petitioners
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Sajjad Ahmad S/O Late Abdul Jaleel R/O Vill.- Mahmoodpur, P.O.- Halai,
P.S.- Tajpur, Dist.- Samastipur
... ... Opposite Parties
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kaushal Kumar Jha, Senior Advocate
Mr. Siddharth Aditya, Advocate
For the Opposite Party-State: Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 06-04-2026 Learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the
petitioners, at the very outset, submits that he would be agitating
his grievance before appropriate forum at appropriate stage and
as such prays for withdrawal of this application.
2. Permission is granted.
3. This application is disposed of as withdrawn with
the liberty aforesaid.
4. It is made clear that this court has not expressed
any opinion on the merits of the case.
(Praveen Kumar, J)
Pawan/-
U T
Checking your session…