Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Vikram MandalversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court directed that the petitioner be released on bail subject to the conditions prescribed under Section 480(3) of the B.N.S.S.

Summary

Vikram Mandal was arrested in connection with a case alleging that he forcibly abducted the minor daughter of an informant and took her to Mumbai, violating Sections 96 and 3(5) of the B.N.S.S. The victim’s statements were contradictory: one indicated a consensual relationship and marriage with the petitioner, while another claimed she was taken by force. The petitioner asserted his innocence, highlighted his clean antecedent, and noted that the victim had not alleged any sexual assault. The prosecution’s case was deemed doubtful, and the charge sheet had already been filed. Considering the doubtful nature of the allegations, the petitioner’s clean record, and the period of custody, the court granted bail with a bond of Rs.10,000 and specific conditions under Section 480(3) of the B.N.S.S.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused under Sections 96 and 3(5) of the B.N.S.S. given the contradictory victim statements and the petitioner’s clean antecedent.

Legislation cited

  • B.N.S.S. — s. 180, 183, 3(5), 480(3), 96

Subjects

  • bail
  • kidnapping
  • minor
  • contradictory statements
  • clean antecedent
  • Section 96 B.N.S.S.
  • Section 3(5) B.N.S.S.
  • Section 480(3) bail conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6039 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-306 Year-2025 Thana- AAJAM NAGAR District- Katihar
                 ======================================================
                 Vikram Mandal S/o Shankar Mandal R/o Asalatganj, Kelabari, P.S.-
                 Azamnagar, Distt.- Katihar

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Sanjeev Kumar Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Binod Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   04-02-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                02. In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in

                   connection with Azamnagar P.S. Case No. 306 of 2025

                   registered for the alleged offences under Sections 96, 3(5) of

                   BNS.

                                03. As per prosecution case, the petitioner and other

                   co-accused persons forcibly took away the minor daughter of

                   the informant while she had been returning home. Subsequently,

                   the informant came to know that the petitioner took her to

                   Mumbai.

                                04. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this

                   case. The victim girl has been recovered and her statement was
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6039 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026
                                            2/3




          recorded. In her statement under Section 180 of BNSS, she

          stated that she was in love with the petitioner for last three years

          and as her marriage was fixed somewhere else by her family

          members, she called out the petitioner and fled away with him

          and married him out of her own sweet will and they moved to

          Mumbai. However, in her statement under Section 183 of

          BNSS, she said that a boy forcibly took her to Katihar and

          married her and thereafter, kept her at a place for 8-9 days but

          this statement could not be believed. But she has not named this

          petitioner which shows there was love between the petitioner

          and the daughter of the informant and it is not believable that

          the daughter of the informant was taken away to Mumbai but

          she did not raise any alarm anywhere. A document has been

          brought on record showing solemnization of marriage between

          the petitioner and the daughter of the informant. Nowhere in her

          statement, the victim girl alleged anything about any sexual

          assault. The petitioner is a boy of 20 years and he is having

          clean antecedent. The petitioner is in custody since 12.09.2025

          and charge sheet has been submitted.

                       05. Learned APP opposes the submission made on

          behalf of the petitioner.

                       06. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6039 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026
                                                        3/3




                      submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the

                      doubtful nature of allegation against the petitioner and also

                      considering the period of custody of the petitioner, his clean

                      antecedent and submission of charge sheet, the petitioner above

                      named is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds

                      of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like

                      amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial

                      Magistrate, Katihar/concerned Court in connection with

                      Azamnagar P.S. Case No. 306 of 2025, subject to the conditions

                      mentioned in Section 480(3) of B.N.S.S. and also the following

                      conditions :

                                              (i) One of the bailors will be a close relative

                                              of the petitioner.

                                              (ii) The petitioner will remain present on

                                              each and every date fixed by the court below.

                                              (iii) In case of absence on three consecutive

                                              dates or in violation of the terms of the bail,

                                              the bail bond of the petitioner will be liable

                                              to be cancelled by the court concerned.



                                                (Arun Kumar Jha, J)
    DKS/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.