Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Rakesh NutversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted regular bail to the petitioner subject to a bond and sureties.

Summary

The petitioner, Rakesh Nut, was arrested in connection with a theft case (Amnaur P.S. Case No. 181 of 2025) alleged under Section 305(a) of the BNS, where unknown persons allegedly stole gold, silver ornaments and cash from three houses. The petitioner claims innocence, asserting that his confessional statement was obtained in a different case and that no stolen items were recovered from his possession; the only recovered mangalsutra was found at a co‑accused’s house and was not placed on the trail of information. He has been in custody since 27 July 2025, exceeding six months, and seeks regular bail. The State opposed the bail, but the court noted the lack of incriminating material against the petitioner apart from his criminal antecedents. Considering the circumstances, the court directed that bail be granted on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to the petitioner’s cooperation with the trial. The order directs the lower court to release the petitioner on bail upon compliance with the bond conditions.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail under Section 305(a) of the BNS given the facts and length of custody.

Legislation cited

  • BNS — s. 305(a)

Subjects

  • bail
  • regular bail
  • theft
  • confessional statement
  • custody
  • Section 305(a)
  • BNS
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6055 of 2026
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-181 Year-2025 Thana- AMNAUR District- Saran
                 ======================================================
                 Rakesh Nut Son of Late Ram Chandra Nut Resident of Village - Olhanpur,
                 P.S. - Marhowrah, Dist. - Saran.
                                                                        ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                  Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                 ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Mili Kumari
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Dr.Mrityunjaya Kr.Gautam
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR
                 PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   04-02-2026                        Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well

                    as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                 2. The petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection

                    with Amnaur P.S. Case No. 181 of 2025, registered for the

                    offences punishable under Sections 305(a) of the BNS.

                                 3. As per allegation, in the night of the incident,

                    unknown persons allegedly committed theft in three houses,

                    including the house of the informant, by breaking open the

                    houses and boxes and allegedly stole gold and silver ornaments

                    along with cash.

                                 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted

                    that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in

                    this case. He has further submitted that the petitioner’s

                    confessional statement was elicited in another case, and thereafter

                    he was remanded in eight cases, including the present one.
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6055 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026
                                                       2/2




                      Nothing was recovered from his possession. The stolen

                      mangalsutra was recovered from the house of the co-accused,

                      which is alleged to have been recovered on the basis of the

                      petitioner’s confessional statement, but the mangalsutra was not

                      put on TIP. The petitioner has been in custody since 27.07.2025.

                                   5. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has

                      opposed the prayer for bail.

                                   6. It appears that, except for criminal antecedents, there

                      is nothing in the present case implicating the petitioner. He has

                      remained in custody for more than six months.

                                   7.   Considering       the    above-mentioned   facts   and

                      circumstances, let the petitioner above-named, is directed to

                      furnish bail bond and on doing so, the court below shall release

                      the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-

                      with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

                      learned J.M.-Ist Class, Saran Chapra/concerned court in

                      connection with Amnaur P.S. Case No. 181 of 2025, subject to

                      the following conditions that the petitioner shall cooperate in

                      the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when

                      required by the court.


                                          (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)
Nirmal/-
U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.