Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

RATAN KUMARversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner subject to conditions under Section 480(3) of the BNSS.

Summary

The petitioner, Ratan Kumar, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 108 and 3(5) of the BNS, alleging that he and co‑accused instigated the suicide of the informant's sister. The prosecution alleged his involvement, while the petitioner claimed false implication and cited a lack of overt act and a clean antecedent. The petitioner’s counsel highlighted that the sister’s suicide was linked to a matrimonial dispute and that the matter had been compromised. The State opposed bail, but the court found the allegations vague and non‑specific and considered the petitioner’s prolonged custody. Consequently, the court granted bail on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, imposing conditions under Section 480(3) of the BNSS and additional attendance requirements.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner despite allegations under Sections 108 and 3(5) of the BNS.
  • Whether the allegations against the petitioner are sufficiently specific to deny bail.
  • Whether conditions under Section 480(3) of the BNSS are applicable in granting bail.

Legislation cited

  • BNS — s. 108, 3(5)
  • BNSS — s. 480(3)

Subjects

  • bail
  • false implication
  • suicide
  • instigation
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • Section 108
  • Section 3(5)
  • Section 480(3)
  • Bihar

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6071 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-547 Year-2025 Thana- HARNAUT District- Nalanda
                 ======================================================
                 Ratan Kumar S/O Late Ramjee Mehto R/O Vill.- Gonaman Road, Harnaut,
                 P.S.- Harnaut, Dist.- Nalanda.

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/S
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Bishwajeet Singh, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Md. Ataur Rahman, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   04-02-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in

                   connection with Harnaut P.S. Case No. 547 of 2025, registered

                   for the offences under Sections 108, 3(5) of the BNS.

                                3. As per prosecution case, the sister of the informant

                   committed suicide in the house of the informant and the

                   allegation against the petitioner who is father-in-law of the

                   deceased is that he and other co-accused persons instigated her

                   for committing suicide.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and no

                   occurrence in the manner as alleged has ever taken place. From

                   the FIR it is clear that there is no overt act on the part of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6071 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026
                                             2/3




          petitioner towards instigating the sister of the informant for

          committing suicide. The co-accused son of the petitioner has

          filed    matrimonial        case     against        his   wife(deceased)   in

          Matrimonial Case No. 372 of 2025 before the learned Principal

          Judge, Family Court, Biharsharif. The son of the deceased is

          residing with the family of the petitioner. There is no

          involvement of the petitioner in the whole occurrence. He is

          having clean antecedent and he is in custody since 08.12.2025.

          Learned counsel further submits that good sense has prevailed

          on the informant and the matter has been compromised.

                       5. Learned APP appearing for the State opposes the

          submission made on behalf of the petitioner.

                       6. Having regard to the fact and circumstances and

          submission made on behalf of the parties and considering the

          vague and non-specific nature of allegation against the

          petitioner and further considering his period of custody, the

          petitioner is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail

          bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each with

          two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

          learned ACJM 1st, Nalanda, Biharsharif/concerned court, in

          connection with Harnaut P.S. Case No. 547 of 2025, subject to

          the condition laid down under Section 480(3) of the BNSS and
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6071 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026
                                                         3/3




                       other following conditions:

                                               (i) One of the bailors will be a close

                                               relative of the petitioner.

                                               (ii) The petitioner will remain present on

                                               each and every date fixed by the court

                                               below, if so required by the learned trial

                                               court.

                                               (iii) In case of absence on three

                                               consecutive dates or in violation of the

                                               terms of the bail, the bail bond of the

                                               petitioner will be liable to be cancelled

                                               by the court concerned.



                                                 (Arun Kumar Jha, J)
Anuradha/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.