Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Vivek kumar @ Vivek kumar ramversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner, subject to a bond and specified conditions.

Summary

Vivek Kumar was arrested in connection with a dowry‑death case (Bijdhari P.S. Case No. 57 of 2024) under Sections 80 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023, alleged to have killed his daughter Nishu Kumari over dowry demands. The petitioner contended that the FIR was fabricated, that he had no specific allegation of assault or dowry demand, and that the deceased had committed suicide, as supported by the post‑mortem report indicating asphyxia due to hanging. The prosecution opposed bail but noted that independent witnesses also stated the death was a suicide. The court examined the lack of concrete evidence linking the petitioner to the alleged offence and the medical evidence of suicide, and consequently granted bail on a bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties, imposing conditions of cooperation, presence in court, and non‑tampering with evidence. The bail order also directed verification of the petitioner’s criminal antecedent, with provisions for cancellation if false information is discovered.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused in a dowry‑death case where the death appears to be a suicide and there is no specific allegation against the petitioner.
  • Whether the FIR and charge sheet sufficiently establish the petitioner’s participation in the alleged offence under Sections 80 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • dowry death
  • bail
  • suicide
  • false implication
  • Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita
  • Section 80
  • Section 3(5)
  • post‑mortem report
  • evidence tampering
  • criminal antecedent

Judgment

                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                            CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61513 of 2025
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-57 Year-2024 Thana- Bijdhari District- East Champaran
               ======================================================
               Vivek kumar @ Vivek kumar ram Son of Ramakant ram Resident of Village -
               Lala Chhapara, P.S. - Kesariya(Bijdhari), Dist. - East Champaran.
                                                                               ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                  Versus
               The State of Bihar                                      ... ... Opposite Party/s
               ======================================================
               Appearance :
               For the Petitioner/s     :         Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate
               For the Opposite Party/s :         Mr. Harendra Prasad, APP
               ======================================================
               CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
                                     ORAL ORDER

7 19-03-2026                   Heard Mr. Abhishek Kumar, learned counsel for the

               petitioner as well as Mr. Harendra Prasad, learned Additional Public

               Prosecutor for the State.

                          2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since 19.05.2025

               in connection with Bijdhari P.S. Case No. 57 of 2024, F.I.R. dated

               16.12.2024 for the offences punishable under Sections 80 and 3(5)

               of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023.

                          3. According to prosecution case, the informant alleged

               that the petitioner along with other co-accused person killed his

               daughter, namely, Nishu Kumari (now, deceased) due to non-

               fulfillment of demand of dowry.

                          4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

               petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been implicated in

               the present case merely on the ground that he is husband of the

               deceased. He further submits that the allegation as alleged in the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61513 of 2025(7) dt.19-03-2026
                                            2/4




      F.I.R. is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not committed

      any offences as alleged in the F.I.R. Although the petitioner is

      named in the FIR but from bare perusal of the FIR it appears that

      there is no specific allegation of assault or overt act or demand of

      dowry attributed against him rather there is general and omnibus

      allegation against all the accused persons including the petitioner.

      Infact the deceased has committed suicide herself supported by the

      post-mortem report and apart from that no external and internal

      injury was found on the body of the deceased. He further submits

      that the police after investigation submitted the charge sheet against

      the petitioner and the petitioner is in custody since 19.05.2025.

      The opinion of the doctor is quoted hereinbelow:-

                        “In my opinion the cause of death is asphyxia
                        due to hanging.
                        Caused by:-Ligature material”


                   5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has

      vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner but fairly

      submits that it come during investigation which is recorded in

      paragraph nos. 19 and 20 of the case diary that independent

      witnesses have stated that the deceased has committed suicide

      herself.

                   6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let

      the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61513 of 2025(7) dt.19-03-2026
                                                        3/4




                  bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like

                  amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial

                  Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Bijdhari

                  P.S. Case No. 57 of 2024, subject to the following conditions:-

                                i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be

                   properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and

                   shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on his

                   absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his

                   bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

                                ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the

                   witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move

                   for cancellation of bail.

                               iii. And further condition that the court below shall verify

                  the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it

                  is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent,

                  the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the

                  petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the

                  above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the

                  name of verification.



                                             (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Suruchi/-

U      T
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61513 of 2025(7) dt.19-03-2026
                                            4/4


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.