Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Satya Bhama Devi @ Satyabhama DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court granted permission to withdraw the application and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.

Summary

Satya Bhama Devi and Mani Shankar, petitioners in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding, applied to withdraw their application on the ground that the matter had become infructuous. The learned counsel for the petitioners sought the court's permission for withdrawal. The court examined whether a petition can be withdrawn when it is no longer capable of yielding any relief. Finding no impediment, the court granted the request, allowing the withdrawal. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioners may be permitted to withdraw the application as it has become infructuous

Subjects

  • withdrawal of application
  • infructuous
  • criminal miscellaneous proceeding
  • permission to withdraw
  • petition dismissed

Judgment

                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61688 of 2025
                          Arising Out of PS. Case No.-819 Year-2022 Thana- RUPASPUR District- Patna
                    ======================================================
               1.    Satya Bhama Devi @ Satyabhama Devi, Wife of Late Vimlesh Prasad
                     Singh;
               2.   Mani shankar @ Mani Shankar Singh, Son of Late Vimlesh Prasad Singh;
                    Both are R/o Flat no. 32, Awadh Kunj Apartment, Kachchi Talab, P.S. -
                    Gardani Bagh District - Patna.

                                                                                      ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                          Versus
               1.   The State of Bihar.
               2.   Mr. Abhishek Barnwal, Son of Shri Shubh Lal Barnwal, Resident of Marble
                    Vihar, West Rupaspur, Near Gola Road, Danapur, P.S. - Rupaspur, Dist. -
                    Patna.

                                                           ... ... Opposite Party/s
                    ======================================================
                    Appearance :
                    For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Shahsikant Amar, Adv.
                    For the Opposite Party/s :       Ms. Madhuri Lata, APP
                    ======================================================
                    CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY
                                          ORAL ORDER

2    05-05-2026                    Mr. Shashikant Amar, the learned Advocate for the

                      petitioners, seeks permission to withdraw this application as the

                      matter has become infructuous.

                                   2. Permission is accorded.

                                   3. Dismissed as withdrawn as having become

                      infructuous.



                                                 (Sourendra Pandey, J)
Praveen-II/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.