Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Praveen kumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to specified conditions, under its inherent powers under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Summary

The petitioner, Praveen Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case (Kesariya P.S. Case No. 251 of 2023) involving offences under several IPC sections including assault, robbery and criminal intimidation. The prosecution alleges that Kumar, along with others, assaulted an informant with a sharp weapon on the instructions of Rajendra Ram. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, highlighted that a co‑accused had already been granted anticipatory bail, and argued there was no specific allegation of an overt act against him despite having one prior criminal record. The State opposed the bail. The High Court, applying its inherent powers under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, granted anticipatory bail subject to a Rs.10,000 bond, two sureties, and conditions regarding attendance, verification of antecedents, and cancellation on breach, clarifying that any observations in the order would not affect the trial.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under the circumstances alleged.
  • Whether the prosecution has made a specific allegation of an overt act sufficient to deny bail.
  • Whether the petitioner’s prior criminal antecedent warrants denial of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Indian Penal Code
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • Section 482
  • false implication
  • bail conditions
  • criminal antecedent

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6194 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-251 Year-2023 Thana- KESARIA District- East Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Praveen kumar Son of Late Nandu Ram Resident of village- Bijdhari Mafi,
                 Ps- Kesariya District -East Champaran

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Lalan Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   04-02-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest

                   in connection with Kesariya P.S. Case No. 251 of 2023

                   instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148,

                   341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 354(B), 504 and 506 of the Indian

                   Penal Code.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, allegation against the

                   petitioner is that he along with other named accused persons had

                   assaulted the informant. It has further been alleged that on the

                   instructions of one Rajendra Ram and the petitioner, the other

                   accused persons assaulted the informant with sharp weapon on

                   his head.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6194 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026
                                            2/3




          petitioner has falsely been implicated in the case. It has further

          been submitted that for the same occurrence there is case and

          counter case between the parties. One of the co-accused namely

          Sanjeev Ram @ Sanjeev Kumar vide order dated 27.08.2025

          passed in Cr. Misc. No. 57266 of 2025 has been granted

          anticipatory bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court. It has

          next been submitted that there is no specific allegation of overt

          act against the petitioner who has one criminal antecedent.

                       5. Learned APP appearing on behalf of the State has

          vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

                       6. Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioner is

          directed to be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or

          surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks

          from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, on

          his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten

          Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

          satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Sadar,

          East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Kesariya P.S.

          Case No. 251 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down

          under Section 482 of the BNSS and subject to the following

          conditions:-

                       (i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6194 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026
                                                        3/3




                      petitioner;

                                   (ii) the petitioner will remain present on each and

                      every date fixed by the Court below, if so required by the

                      learned Trial Court;

                                   (iii) in case of absence on two consecutive dates or in

                      violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bonds of the petitioner

                      will liable to be cancelled by the Court concerned;

                                   (iv) the Court below shall verify the criminal

                      antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found

                      that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the

                      court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bonds of the

                      petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the

                      above mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of the

                      same on in the name of verification.

                                   7. It is made clear that the observations, if any, made

                      in this order, shall be of no bearing during the trial.



                                               (Sourendra Pandey, J)
krishna/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.