Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Santosh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

The court held that bail cannot be granted as the trial is in progress and no fresh ground has been demonstrated.

Summary

Santosh Kumar was charged under IPC sections 341, 323, 324, 302, 504 and 506/34 for stabbing a victim in a trivial dispute. He has been in custody since July 2023 and the trial has already commenced with two witnesses examined. The petitioner sought regular bail for the second time after an earlier bail denial on 12‑02‑2025. The court observed that the seriousness of the offences, especially murder, and the fact that the trial is underway, provide no fresh ground for bail. Consequently, the bail application was dismissed and the trial was directed to be concluded at the earliest.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail should be granted to an accused charged with murder and other serious offences when the trial has already commenced
  • Whether the petitioner has shown any fresh ground justifying a change in the earlier bail order

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • regular bail
  • trial commencement
  • serious offences
  • IPC
  • murder
  • high court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62211 of 2025
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-504 Year-2023 Thana- MANER District- Patna
                 ======================================================
                 Santosh Kumar S/O Late Manu Ray @ Mannu Ray @ Mannu Singh Resident
                 of Village Mohanpur P.S.- Maner, Dist.- Patna.

                                                                                        ... ... Petitioner
                                                          Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                          ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner        :         Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate
                 For the State             :         Mr. Ram Anurag Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   10-02-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                      2.       This is the second attempt on behalf of the

                   petitioner for grant of regular bail in connection with Maner P.S.

                   Case No.504 of 2023 registered for the offence under sections

                   341, 323, 324, 302, 504 and 506/34 of the B.N.S., 2023.

                                      3.       Earlier, the bail of the petitioner was rejected

                   by this Court vide order dated 12.02.2025 passed in Criminal

                   Miscellaneous No.68360 of 2024. The aforesaid order dated

                   12.02.2025 reads as under:-

                                               “Heard     learned      counsel   for    the
                                      petitioner and learned APP for the State.
                                               2.   The   petitioner     seeks   bail    in
                                      connection with Maner P.S. Case No. 504 of
                                      2023 registered for the offence punishable
                                      under Sections 341, 323, 324, 302, 504 and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62211 of 2025(3) dt.10-02-2026
                                              2/3




                          506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
                                  3. For a trivial dispute, the deceased
                          was stabbed by the petitioner.
                                  4. It has been submitted by learned
                          counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is
                          in custody since 13.07.2023.
                                  5. It has very fairly been submitted by
                          learned counsel for the petitioner that the trial
                          has started and one witness has already been
                          examined.
                                  6. Learned APP appearing for the State
                          opposes the prayer for regular bail of the
                          petitioner.
                                  7. In view of the fact that the petitioner
                          has stabbed the victim and also the fact that
                          the trial has commenced, this Court is not
                          inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
                                  8. Accordingly, the application stands
                          dismissed.
                                  9. Since the trial has commenced, the
                          Court below is directed to conclude the same
                          at the earliest.”


                          4.      From the report of the trial Judge, it appears

          that out of eight chargesheeted witnesses, two witnesses have

          already been examined in the trial.

                          5.      Considering the fact that the trial is

          proceeding, I am not inclined to review my earlier order dated

          12.02.2025. Further, the learned counsel for the petitioner is not

          able to show any fresh ground for grant of bail to the petitioner.

          Accordingly, this bail application is dismissed.
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62211 of 2025(3) dt.10-02-2026
                                                          3/3




                                        6.      The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna is

                        directed to ensure the presence of witnesses in the trial.

                                        7.      Let a copy of this order be communicated to

                        the Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna forthwith through

                        FAX or e-mail for its compliance.



                                                                   (Sandeep Kumar, J)

pawan/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.