Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Abhishek KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted regular bail to the petitioner, directing him to furnish a bail bond and sureties.

Summary

The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar, was arrested in connection with a theft case (Patepur PS Case No. 249 of 2025) involving the robbery of silver coins, mobile phones, and cash, alleged under Sections 334(1) and 303(2) of the B.N.S. CCTV footage identified co‑accused Rajan Kumar, whose confessional statement mentioned the petitioner, leading to the petitioner’s detention since 22‑07‑2025. The petitioner’s counsel argued that he was falsely implicated and that the co‑accused had already been granted bail. The State opposed the bail application, contending that the evidence warranted continued custody. After considering the facts, the court directed the petitioner to furnish a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and ordered his release, subject to cooperation with the trial. The order effectively granted regular bail to the petitioner.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail under Sections 334(1) and 303(2) of the B.N.S. despite the co‑accused’s confessional statement linking him to the theft.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • regular bail
  • theft
  • CCTV evidence
  • confessional statement
  • Sections 334(1) B.N.S.
  • Section 303(2) B.N.S.
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6223 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-249 Year-2025 Thana- PATEPUR District- Vaishali
                 ======================================================
                 Abhishek Kumar Son of Surendra Bhagat Resident of village - Mukundpur,
                 P.S.- Patepur, District - Vaishali.
                                                                         ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                     Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                  ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Rupa Kumari
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr.Umesh Lal Verma
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR
                 PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   04-02-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   A.P.P for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has preferred this application for

                   grant of regular bail in connection with Patepur P.S. Case No.

                   249 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under

                   Sections 334(1) and 303(2) of the B.N.S.

                                3. As per the prosecution, it is alleged that certain

                   unknown miscreants unlawfully entered the showroom of the

                   informant and committed theft of approximately 30 to 40 boxes

                   of silver coins, three mobile phones, and cash amounting to Rs.

                   2,80,555/- from the cash drawer. During investigation, the

                   applicant, Rajan Kumar, who is currently employed in the

                   agency, was identified in the CCTV footage of the showroom.

                                4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6223 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026
                                                       2/2




                     that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in

                     this case. He has further submitted that the petitioner’s name has

                     figured in the confessional statement of co-accused Rajan

                     Kumar, who was seen in the CCTV footage and the looted

                     articles were recovered from possession of Rajan Kumar. Said

                     Rajan Kumar has been granted bail. The petitioner has been in

                     custody since 22.07.2025.

                                  5. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has

                     opposed the prayer for bail.

                                  6. Considering the above-mentioned facts and

                     circumstances, let the petitioner above-named, is directed to

                     furnish bail bond and on doing so, the court below shall release

                     the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-

                     with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

                     learned ACJM, Vaishali at Hajipur/ concerned court in

                     connection with Patepur P.S. Case No. 249 of 2025, subject to

                     the following conditions that the petitioner shall cooperate in

                     the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when

                     required by the court.


                                          (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)

Nirmal/-
U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.