Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Jainath Yadav @ Jai Nath Yadav @ Jaynath Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted regular bail to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Jainath Yadav, was arrested in connection with a case involving 27 accused for the alleged brutal assault and murder of a deceased person, charged under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code (147, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 309, 504, 506) and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that the accused used a rod and a tractor in the killing, but the petitioner’s counsel argued that the post‑mortem report showed only eight injuries, inconsistent with the alleged scale of assault, and claimed the petitioner was falsely implicated. The petitioner, who has one prior criminal antecedent and has been in custody since 24‑07‑2025, offered to cooperate with the trial. The State’s Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the bail. After considering the circumstances, the Court allowed the petition for regular bail, directing release upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties. The order was pronounced by Justice Sandeep Kumar.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail should be granted to the petitioner despite the seriousness of the offences and the evidence presented
  • Whether the post‑mortem report undermines the prosecution’s case against the petitioner

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • Indian Penal Code
  • Arms Act
  • post‑mortem evidence
  • presumption of innocence
  • regular bail

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6224 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-210 Year-2023 Thana- MANJHAGARH District- Gopalganj
                 ======================================================
                 Jainath Yadav @ Jai Nath Yadav @ Jaynath Kumar Yadav Son of Suraj Yadav
                 @ Surya Yadaw Resident of Village- Dharam Parsa (Ahirtoli), P.S.-
                 Manjhagarh, District- Gopalganj
                                                                          ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                 Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                   ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr.Raghav Prasad, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr.Upendra Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   16-04-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with

                   Manjhagarh P.S. Case No. 210/2023 registered for the offences

                   punishable under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 309,

                   504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of Arms

                   Act.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, petitioner and 26 other

                   accused persons are said to have brutally assaulted the deceased.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the

                   present case. It is next submitted that the post-mortem report

                   does not support the prosecution case and if 27 persons

                   assaulted the deceased a large number of injury should have
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6224 of 2026(3) dt.16-04-2026
                                                          2/2




                        been caused to the deceased whereas the number of injuries

                        caused to the deceased are only eight. Learned counsel further

                        submits that petitioner is accused of assaulting the deceased

                        with a rod and a tractor was also used in killing the deceased but

                        the post-mortem report does not support the prosecution.

                        Petitioner has one criminal antecedent and he is in custody since

                        24.07.2025. The petitioner undertakes to co-operate in the case/

                        trial.

                                     5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer

                        for regular bail of the petitioner.

                                     6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the

                        case, this application for regular bail is allowed.

                                     7. Accordingly, let the petitioner, above named, be

                        released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten

                        Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

                        satisfaction      of    the    learned      Chief    Judicial   Magistrate,

                        Gopalganj/concerned            Court     below      in   connection   with

                        Manjhagarh P.S. Case No. 210/2023.



                                                   (Sandeep Kumar, J)
tusharika/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.