Patna High Court

Sanju YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided: 11 March 2026
Disposal: BAIL GRANTED
Bench: PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH

Holding

The petition is dismissed for default.

Summary

Sanju Yadav filed a criminal miscellaneous petition (No.62315 of 2025) against the State of Bihar in the Patna High Court. The petitioner failed to appear before the court on the scheduled dates despite repeated notices. The court observed that the petitioner had lost interest in pursuing the case. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition for default. No evidence or arguments were presented by the petitioner, and the respondent was represented by Advocate Pushpa Sinha.

Issues considered

Whether the petition should be dismissed for default due to the petitioner's failure to appear

Subjects

Criminal Procedure Code
Default Judgment
Petition Dismissal
Non-appearance

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62315 of 2025
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-199 Year-2024 Thana- PARAIYA District- Gaya
                  ======================================================
                  Sanju Yadav S/o- Narsingh Yadav Village- Kamaldah, Police Station- Paraiya,
                  District-Gaya

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :       None
                  For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Pushpa Sinha, APP
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
                                        ORAL ORDER

3    03-11-2025                      Nobody appears for the petitioner, despite repeated

                    calls.

                                 2. Same was the position on the previous date.

                                 3 . It appears that the petitioner has lost interest in

                    pursuing this case.

                                 4. It is dismissed for default.



                                           (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Koushik/-

U      T

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…