Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Md Moin @ Md NaimversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the application, dismissing it as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Md Moin, filed an application seeking permission to withdraw it after charges were framed, requesting to raise all points later in the trial. The petitioner’s counsel asked the court to allow the withdrawal and to permit raising the grounds of the application at the appropriate stage of the trial. The court considered the request and granted permission to withdraw the application. Consequently, the application was dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to raise the points later. The court expressly stated that it did not express any opinion on the merits of the underlying criminal case.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the application after charges have been framed

Subjects

  • withdrawal of application
  • criminal procedure
  • permission to withdraw
  • trial stage

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62445 of 2025
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-186 Year-2024 Thana- AMDABAD District- Katihar
                 ======================================================
                 Md Moin @ Md Naim Son of Abul Kasim R/o Ahilgaon, Ward no. 7, P.S. -
                 Jalalgarh, Dist.- Purnea.

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.    X D/o Y R/o Village - Z, SHO Amdabad Police Station, Katihar, in
                 connection with Amdabad P.S. case no. 186 by 2024, Dist. - Katihar.

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Sanjeev Kumar Singh, Adv
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Sanjay Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   23-04-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner

                   seeks permission to withdraw this application as during the

                   pendency of this case charges came to be framed and further

                   prays to raise all the points available to him and also the

                   grounds pleaded in this application at the appropriate stage of

                   the trial.

                                 3. Prayer is allowed.

                                 4. Accordingly, this application is dismissed as

                   withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.

                                 5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62445 of 2025(2) dt.23-04-2026
                                                         2/2




                       my opinion on the merits of this case.



                                                  (Praveen Kumar, J)
niku/-

U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.