Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Anish Raj @ Anish ThakurversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted regular bail to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Anish Raj, was implicated in a case registered under Section 304 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, alleging that he participated in the robbery of cash amounting to Rs.82,900. He contended that the FIR was filed against unknown persons and that his inclusion was a false implication based on a confessional statement made in another case, noting that no incriminating material was recovered from him and he had not been produced for a T.I. parade despite being in custody since 2 September 2025. The State opposed his application for regular bail. The Court examined the FIR, the investigation material, the fact that a chargesheet had been filed, and the duration of his custody. Considering these factors, the Court ordered that the petitioner be released on regular bail upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate‑I, Bagaha. The bail was granted to the petitioner.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail under Section 304 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, given the chargesheet and his period of custody.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • regular bail
  • Section 304
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • false implication
  • chargesheet
  • custody
  • West Champaran
  • High Court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6264 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-179 Year-2024 Thana- BAGHA District- West Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Anish Raj @ Anish Thakur S/O Dinesh Thakur R/O Village - Sahasraw,
                 Police station- Bhairoganj, District- West Champaran

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Brij Kishor Mishra, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Ram Anurag Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   04-02-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the parties.

                                2. The petitioner has preferred this application for

                   grant of regular bail in connection with Bagaha P.S. Case no.

                   179 of 2024 registered under section 304 of the Bharatiya

                   Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states

                   that while he along with one another were returning on a

                   motorcycle after having collected a total amount of Rs.82,900/-,

                   two accused persons asked them to stop their motorcycle and

                   having snatched the bag containing the cash, escaped.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the FIR

                   was registered against unknown. The petitioner was falsely

                   implicated in the case in course of investigation on the basis of a

                   confessional statement of the petitioner made before police in one
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6264 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026
                                                       2/2




                     another case. The cause of false implication of the petitioner are his

                     antecedents. Neither any incriminating article has been recovered

                     from the petitioner’s possession nor has the petitioner been put on

                     T.I. parade inspite of being in custody since 2.9.2025. Chargesheet

                     has been submitted in the case.

                                  5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP

                     for the State.

                                  6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                     taking into consideration the allegations in the FIR, the material

                     that has transpired in course of investigation as is evident from

                     the order of the learned trial Court, the petitioner being in

                     custody since 2.9.2025 and chargesheet having been submitted

                     in the case, the Court directs the petitioner to be enlarged on bail in

                     connection with Bagaha P.S. Case no. 179 of 2024 on furnishing bail

                     bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the

                     like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief

                     Judicial Magistrate-I, Bagaha, West Champaran.



                                                 (Partha Sarthy, J)
sauravkrsinha/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.