Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Kamindar PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
REJECTED

Holding

The court refused bail to the petitioner, finding the allegations against him specific and serious.

Summary

Kamindar Paswan was arrested on 3 June 2025 in connection with a case involving alleged stabbing of two individuals with knives, resulting in multiple injuries. The prosecution alleged that Paswan, along with co‑accused, attacked the victims and stole a mobile phone, and presented post‑mortem evidence of stab wounds. Paswan’s counsel argued that he has a clean antecedent, was falsely implicated, and that the FIR contains only vague, omnibus allegations against him. The State’s Additional Public Prosecutor countered that the FIR specifically implicates Paswan and that the medical evidence confirms his participation in the assault. After considering the facts, the court found the allegations credible and declined to grant bail, refusing the petitioner's application.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner in light of the serious nature of the offences alleged under Sections 109(1), 118(2), 127(2), 303(2) and 3(5) of the BNS.

Legislation cited

  • BNS — s. 109(1), 118(2), 127(2), 303(2), 3(5)

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • stabbing
  • knife assault
  • post‑mortem evidence
  • charge sheet
  • Bihar
  • serious offences

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6273 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-173 Year-2025 Thana- ASHTHAWAN District- Nalanda
                 ======================================================
                 Kamindar Paswan S/o Sheonandan Paswan @ Shivnandan Paswan R/o
                 Village - Chulihari, Post - Noawan, P.S.- Asthawan, District - Nalanda

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Mrityunjay Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Anil Kumar, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

5   28-04-2026                      Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                               2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since

                   03.06.2025 in connection with Asthawan P.S. Case No. 173 of

                   2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 109(1), 118(2),

                   127(2), 303(2) and 3(5) of BNS.

                               3.     The case of the prosecution, in brief, is that

                   informant, Chandan Kumar alleged that he and Pritam Kumar,

                   the son of his uncle's brother-in-law were going to Lakhanu

                   Bigha in a tempo to meet a friend. The Petitioner, Chirag

                   Paswan and Raviraj Paswan stopped the tempo near the

                   Lakhanu Bigha turn, stabbed them with knives with the

                   intention of killing and injuring them. When people nearby

                   came, they snatched Pritam Kumar's Motorola mobile and fled.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6273 of 2026(5) dt.28-04-2026
                                            2/3




          They were then brought to Biharsharif for treatment.

                      4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

          petitioner has clean antecedent and is innocent and he has

          falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel for

          the petitioner submits that police after investigation has

          submitted charge-sheet under Sections 109(1), 118(2), 103(1)

          303(2) and 3(5) of BNS. Learned counsel for the petitioner

          further submits that although the petitioner is named in the FIR

          but from bare perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR it

          appears that there is no direct and specific allegation against the

          petitioner rather the allegations are general and omnibus in

          nature.

                      5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the

          State on the basis of materials available on record and the case

          dairy has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the

          petitioner and submits that from bare perusal of the allegation as

          alleged in the FIR it appears that there is direct and specific

          allegation against the petitioner that he has assaulted the

          deceased by means of knife along with other co-accused

          persons. It is next submitted that from bare perusal of the

          postmortem report of the deceased it appears that four stab

          injuries were found on the person of the deceased which
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6273 of 2026(5) dt.28-04-2026
                                                       3/3




                     suggests that all the accused persons have assaulted to the

                     deceased by means of knife and apart from that informant has

                     also sustained injury.

                                  6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case

                     supported by the medical evidence, I am not inclined to enlarge

                     the petitioner on bail in connection with Asthawan P.S. Case No.

                     173 of 2025 pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate,

                     First Class, Nalanda at Biharsharif.

                                  7. Prayer is refused.



                                            (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Gaurav Sinha/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.