Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Mithun RaiversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court allowed the petition for anticipatory bail, granting it subject to prescribed conditions.

Summary

Mithun Rai sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS No.19/2023) involving alleged offences under Sections 147, 149, 323, 504, 302 and 506 IPC, where he was accused of assaulting an informant’s family and causing the death of the informant’s father by pressing his testicles. The petitioner’s counsel argued that he was falsely implicated, that the post‑mortem report indicated death due to chest compression and sternum fracture rather than testicular injury, and that no specific overt act was alleged against him, emphasizing his clean antecedent. The State opposed the bail, contending the seriousness of the charges. The Court, after considering the submissions and the circumstances, granted anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the CrPC read with Section 482(2) of the BNSS, imposing conditions such as a bail bond, sureties, presence at trial, and verification of antecedents. The order clarified that any observations made would not affect the trial, and the application was allowed.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under Section 438 CrPC in view of the alleged offences.
  • Whether the prosecution’s case sufficiently implicates the petitioner to deny bail.
  • Whether the post‑mortem findings and lack of specific allegation against the petitioner affect the bail decision.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Section 438 CrPC
  • false implication
  • IPC offences
  • post‑mortem report
  • bail conditions
  • criminal antecedent

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6302 of 2026
                 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-19 Year-2023 Thana- NIMACHANDPURA District- Begusarai
                 ======================================================
                 Mithun Rai Son of Kapildev Rai Resident of village- Ramanand Nagar, Ps-
                 Neemachandpura, Dist- Begusarai

                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :     Mr. S.K. Lal, Sr. Adv.
                                                Mr.Pritish Kumar Lal, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :     Mr.Bhanu Pratap Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   04-02-2026                     Heard learned Senior counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection

                   with Nemachandpura P.S. Case No. 19 of 2023 (G.R. No.

                   422/2023) dated 05.02.2023 registered for the offences

                   punishable under Sections 147, 149, 323, 504, 302 and 506 of

                   the Indian Penal Code.

                                 3. The allegation against the petitioner is that he along

                   with seven other named accused persons assaulted the informant

                   and his brother. It is further alleged that when the informant’s

                   father intervened, they all started beating his father, in the

                   meantime, it is alleged that the co-accused, Hareram Mahto and

                   Kapildev Rai pressed the testicles of the informant’s father and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6302 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026
                                            2/4




          subsequently, he died.

                       4. The learned Senior counsel for the petitioner

          submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case

          and no such occurrence as alleged has occurred. It has further

          been submitted that the specific case of the prosecution is that

          on pressing of the testicles of the informant’s father, he died,

          however, from perusal of the Post-mortem report, it would

          appear that multiple injuries were found on the chest and right

          leg anterior surface and the cause of death is stated to be

          asphyxia caused by compression of chest and fracture of

          sternum. Learned Senior counsel has further submitted that

          there is no specific allegation of overt act against the petitioner.

          It has lastly been submitted that the petitioner has clean

          antecedent.

                       5. The learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently

          opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

                       6. Considering the aforesaid submissions made by the

          parties and taking into account the facts and circumstances of

          the case, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released

          on anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the

          Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on

          furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand)
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6302 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026
                                            3/4




          with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

          the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor

          court in connection with Nemachandpura P.S. Case No. 19 of

          2023 (G.R. No. 422/2023), subject to the conditions as laid

          down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure

          read with corresponding Section 482(2) of BNSS as well as

          subject to the following conditions:-

                        (i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the

          petitioner.

                        (ii) The petitioner shall remain physically present

          before the concerned Court on each and every date of the trial

          and shall cooperate in the investigation.

                        (iii) In case of absence on two consecutive dates or in

          violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the petitioner

          will be liable to be cancelled by the Court concerned.

                        (iv) The trial court shall verify the criminal antecedent

          of the petitioner and in case, at any stage, it is found that the

          petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents, the trial court

          shall take necessary steps for cancellation of bail bond of the

          petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bond in terms of the

          above mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in

          the name of verification.
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6302 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026
                                                       4/4




                                  7. It is made clear that the observations, if any, made

                     in this order, shall be of no bearing during the trial.

                                  8. The application stands allowed.



                                              (Sourendra Pandey, J)
Gautam/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.