Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Chandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court dismissed the application as withdrawn upon the petitioner's request.

Summary

Chandan Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous application before the Patna High Court. The petitioner was represented by Advocate Shivendra Prasad and the State of Bihar by APP Md. Ataur Rahman. After hearing both sides, the petitioner requested that the application be withdrawn. The court granted permission for withdrawal. Consequently, the application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner may withdraw the pending application and the court may dismiss it on that basis.

Subjects

  • withdrawal of application
  • criminal miscellaneous proceedings
  • procedural law
  • court order

Judgment

                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63255 of 2025
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-468 Year-2025 Thana- BODHGAYA District- Gaya
                   ======================================================
                   Chandan Kumar son of Indradev Saw Resident of Village- Tikabigha, Ps-
                   Bodhgaya, Dist- Gaya Ji

                                                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
              1.   The State of Bihar
              2.   Anjani Kumar son of Suresh Sharma Resident of Village- Prijpwra, Ps-
                   Shakurabad, Dist- Jehanabad

                                                          ... ... Opposite Party/s
                   ======================================================
                   Appearance :
                   For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Shivendra Prasad, Advocate
                   For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Md. Ataur Rahman, APP
                   ======================================================
                   CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA
                                         ORAL ORDER

2    05-01-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                     APP for the State.

                                  2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the

                     petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present application.

                                  3. Permission is accorded.

                                  4. Accordingly, this application is dismissed as

                     withdrawn.



                                                (Soni Shrivastava, J)
anand/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.