Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

GAJALA KHATOON @ GAJALA PARVEENversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

A second anticipatory bail application without fresh material is not maintainable.

Summary

The petitioner, Gajala Khatoon, filed a second anticipatory bail application after an earlier application was rejected on merit on 1 October 2024. The petition did not present any new facts or circumstances to warrant reconsideration. The court noted that, in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in G.R. Ananda Babu v. State of Tamil Nadu (2021 SCC Online SC 176), a second anticipatory bail application without fresh material is not maintainable. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition. The order was delivered by Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh of the Patna High Court on 8 January 2026.

Issues considered

  • Whether a second anticipatory bail application can be entertained in the absence of new facts or circumstances.

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • criminal procedure
  • re-application
  • Supreme Court precedent

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63269 of 2025

                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-390 Year-2023 Thana- BISFI District- Madhubani
                 ======================================================
                 GAJALA KHATOON @ GAJALA PARVEEN D/o- Md. Gulab Village-
                 Chachhua Uttarwi Tola Po- Ghat Bhatra Ps- Bisfi Dist- Madhubani

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus

                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner      :        Mr. Abu Nasar, Advocate
                 For the State           :        Mr. Pramod Kumr Pandey, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

5   08-01-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. This is second anticipatory bail application on

                   behalf of the petitioner. Earlier, the prayer for grant of

                   anticipatory bail to the petitioner was rejected on merit vide

                   order dated 01.10.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 62358 of 2024.

                                3. This application does not reveal any new facts and

                   circumstances for reconsideration of prayer for grant of

                   anticipatory bail to the petitioner. In view of the recent judgment

                   of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of G.R. Ananda

                   Babu Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr. reported in 2021 SCC

                   OnLine SC 176, this second anticipatory bail on behalf of the
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63269 of 2025(5) dt.08-01-2026
                                                         2/2




                       petitioner is not maintainable.

                                    4. This application is, accordingly, dismissed.



                                             (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
shashank/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.