Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Dinesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The petitioner is entitled to bail and is released upon furnishing the prescribed bond and sureties.

Summary

The petitioner, Dinesh Kumar, was arrested in connection with a theft of Rs. 43,000 alleged under Section 309(6) of the Bihar Narcotic Substitution Act, 2023. He claimed innocence, stating the FIR named unknown miscreants and that a co‑accused, Anil Kumar Thakur, had confessed and was already on bail. The petitioner argued that no material was recovered from him, he has no prior criminal record, and he has been in judicial custody since 17 September 2025. The State opposed bail, but the court, after hearing both sides, found the petitioner's circumstances comparable to the co‑accused and noted the lack of incriminating evidence against him. Consequently, the court ordered his release on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount. The order was pronounced by Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail under Section 309(6) of the B.N.S., 2023 given the facts of the case
  • Whether the lack of recovered material and the co‑accused’s confession justify granting bail

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • Section 309(6) B.N.S. 2023
  • theft
  • presumption of innocence
  • judicial custody

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6388 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-168 Year-2025 Thana- ISMAILPUR District- Bhagalpur
                 ======================================================
                 Dinesh Kumar Son of Jairam Mandal Resident of Village - Ismailpur, P.S.-
                 Ismailpur, District - Bhagalpur.

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Rajendra Prasad Nat, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   06-02-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection

                   with Ismailpur P.S. Case No. 168 of 2025 registered for the

                   offence punishable under Section 309(6) of the B.N.S., 2023.

                                3. The case of the prosecution in short is that

                   unknown miscreants have looted Rs. 43,000/- in cash from the

                   informant.

                                4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has

                   committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this

                   case. He also submits that the FIR was lodged against unknown

                   miscreants. During course of investigation, one Anil Kumar

                   Thakur has given his confessional statement in which the name
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6388 of 2026(2) dt.06-02-2026
                                                       2/2




                     of this petitioner has surfaced. He also submits that nothing has

                     been recovered from the possession of this petitioner. He also

                     submits that co-accused namely, Anil Kumar Thakur has already

                     been granted bail by this court vide Cr. Misc. No. 88638 of

                     2025. The case of this petitioner stands on similar footing. He

                     further submits that a statement has been made in para 3 of the

                     petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is

                     languishing in judicial custody since 17.09.2025.

                                  5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP

                     for the State.

                                  6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                     considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

                     inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named

                     petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail

                     bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties

                     of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial

                     Magistrate, 1st Class, Naugachia, Bhagalpur in connection with

                     Ismailpur P.S. Case No. 168 of 2025.



                                                    (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
Sudhanshu/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.