Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Shubham Kumar @ Shubham Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The Court permitted the withdrawal of the application and granted the petitioner liberty to raise all points at the time of framing of charge.

Summary

The petitioner, Shubham Kumar, filed an application before the Patna High Court. His counsel sought permission to withdraw the application while retaining the liberty to raise all points at the charge‑framing stage. The Court, after hearing the parties, granted the request, allowing the withdrawal and confirming that the petitioner may raise his points later. The Court expressly clarified that it has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the underlying case. Accordingly, the application was disposed of as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the application with liberty to raise all points at the time of framing of charge?

Subjects

  • withdrawal of application
  • criminal procedure
  • charge framing
  • petitioner's liberty

Judgment

                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6410 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-380 Year-2024 Thana- SHRIKRISHNAPURI District- Patna
                   ======================================================
                   Shubham Kumar @ Shubham Kumar Singh Son of Late Ranjeet Kumar
                   Resident of Village- Shadipur, P.S.- Nardiganj, District- Nawada

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                   The State of Bihar

                                                          ... ... Opposite Party/s
                   ======================================================
                   Appearance :
                   For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Amresh Kumar Sinha, Advocate
                   For the Opposite Party/s :      Dr. Mritunjaya Kumar Gautam, APP
                   ======================================================
                   CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR
                                         ORAL ORDER

3     26-03-2026                    Heard the parties.

                                  2. At the very outset, the learned counsel for

                     petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with

                     liberty to the petitioner to raise all the points at the time of

                     framing of charge.

                                  3. Permission is accorded.

                                  4. Accordingly, the present application is disposed of

                     as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty to the petitioner.

                                  5. It is clarified that this Court has not expressed any

                     opinion on the merits of the case.



                                                (Praveen Kumar, J)
Jyoti/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.