Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Saffiullah @ Shafiullah @ SafiullahversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that the petitioner is entitled to bail as he is not named in the FIR, the victim’s statement does not implicate him, and he has a clean antecedent, subject to conditions.

Summary

The petitioner applied for regular bail in connection with offences under Sections 140(3) and 3(5) of the BNS Act, alleged to involve the abduction of a minor. The FIR named four accused, but the petitioner’s name does not appear in it, and the victim’s statement under Section 183 of the BNSS only mentions that the petitioner received the child from the railway station, without any allegation of wrongdoing. The petitioner has been in custody since 26‑03‑2025 and possesses a clean antecedent. The court examined whether the absence of a direct accusation against the petitioner and his clean record justified granting bail despite the serious nature of the charges. Considering these facts, the court ordered the petitioner’s release on bail, subject to a bond of Rs.10,000 and two sureties, and imposed conditions of cooperation with the trial. The order was pronounced by Justice Nawneet Kumar Pandey.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail despite the charges under Sections 140(3) and 3(5) of the BNS Act.
  • Whether the petitioner’s non‑inclusion in the FIR and the victim’s statement under Section 183 of the BNSS preclude denial of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • regular bail
  • BNS Act
  • POCSO Act
  • minor abduction
  • FIR
  • clean antecedents
  • bail bond

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64329 of 2025
                 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-80 Year-2025 Thana- SHIKARGANJ District- East Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Saffiullah @ Shafiullah @ Safiullah S/O Ushllan Ansari @ Uslain Ansari @
                 Uslan Ansari R/O village - Bagaha @ Bagaha Sonbarsa, P.S. - Kanaulle @
                 Kanauli @ Kanhauli, Dist. - Sitamarhi

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar BIHAR
           2.    Rekha Devi W/O Jagdish Mahto R/o Vill.- Kathmalia @ Kathmaliya, P.S.-
                 Shikarganj, Dist.- East Champaran.

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr.Santosh Kumar
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr.Sanjay Kumar Tiwary
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR
                 PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

5   21-01-2026                        Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

                                     2. This is an application for regular bail on behalf

                   of the petitioner for the offences alleged under Sections 140(3)

                   and 3(5) of the BNS registered in connection with Shikarganj

                   P.S.Case No. 80/2025.

                                3. As per allegation, the accused persons lured and

                   abducted the minor daughter of the informant for ulterior

                   motives. It is alleged that the petitioner is also instrumental in

                   this misadventure.

                                4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted

                   that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated.

                   Four persons have specifically been named in the FIR, but the
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64329 of 2025(5) dt.21-01-2026
                                                       2/2




                     petitioner is not named therein. In her statement under Section

                     183 of the BNSS, the victim did not level allegation against the

                     petitioner, except that the petitioner received her from the

                     railway station. The petitioner is in custody since 26.03.2025

                     and is a person of clean antecedents.

                                  5. Considering the above facts and circumstances, let

                     the petitioner, above-named, be released on bail on furnishing

                     bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the

                     like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 6 th District and

                     Additional Sessions           Judge-cum-Exclusive Special Judge,

                     POCSO Act, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with

                     Shikarganj P.S.Case No. 80/2025, subject to the conditions that

                     the petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make

                     himself available as and when required by the court.


                                          (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)

HR/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.