Patna High Court
Dharam Raj Paswan @ Dharm Raj Paswan @ Dharm Raj Kumar @ Dharm Ram PaswanversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY
Holding
The Court granted regular bail to the petitioner subject to a bail bond and sureties.
Summary
The petitioner, Dharam Raj Paswan, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 376, 506/34 of the IPC, Section 6 of the POCSO Act and Section 67 of the IT Act, alleging penetrative rape, recording obscene videos, and threatening the victim. The petitioner sought regular bail, contending that he has a clean antecedent, has been in custody since 23.05.2025, and that he and the informant have married and are living a happy conjugal life. The counsel for the informant (Opposite Party No.2) also acknowledged the marriage and harmonious relationship. Considering these facts, the Court directed that bail be granted upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to the petitioner’s cooperation in the trial. The order was pronounced by Hon’ble Justice Nawneet Kumar Pandey.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriateness of granting regular bail to an accused charged with rape, threats, and offences under the POCSO and IT Acts?
- Whether the marriage and alleged harmonious relationship between the accused and the informant affect the bail decision.
Legislation cited
- Indian Penal Code — s. 376, 506/34
- Information Technology Act — s. 67
- Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act — s. 6
Subjects
- regular bail
- rape
- POCSO Act
- IPC
- IT Act
- criminal procedure
- marriage
- bail bond
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64641 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-52 Year-2025 Thana- DARBHANGA SADAR District-
Darbhanga
======================================================
Dharam Raj Paswan @ Dharm Raj Paswan @ Dharm Raj Kumar @ Dharm
Ram Paswan S/o Kailash Paswan R/o village - Madhurapur, Shivjee Nagar,
Hathauri Kothi, P.S - Hathauri, District - Samastipur
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Saleha Parween D/o Mohammad Rabbani R/o Village - Loam, P.S - Sadar,
District - Darbhanga
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Mrityunjay Kumar,Adv.
Mr. Arinjay Kumar, Adv.
For the O.P. No. 2 : Mr. Mukesh Kr. Singh, Adv.
Md. Danish Quamar, Adv.
Mr. Rajiv Kumar, Adv.
For the State : Mr.Anand Kishore Choudhary, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR
PANDEY
ORAL ORDER
6 21-01-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well
as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection
with Sadar P.S. Case No. 52 of 2025, registered for the offences
punishable under Sections 376, 506/34 of the IPC and Section
06 of the POCSO Act and Section 67 of the I.T. Act.
3. The allegation against the petitioner is that he
committed penetrative rape upon the informant on several
occasions, recorded obscene videos on her mobile phone,
threatened to make the same viral and pressurized her to leave
her husband.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64641 of 2025(6) dt.21-01-2026
2/2
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted
that the petitioner and the victim have solemnized their marriage
and are living happily. He has further submitted that the
petitioner is a person of clean antecedent and has been in
custody since 23.05.2025.
5. On the other hand, the learned counsel for the
informant has conceded that the petitioner and the informant
have solemnized their marriage and are living happy conjugal
life.
6. Considering the above-mentioned facts and
circumstances, let the petitioner above-named, is directed to
furnish bail bond and on doing so, the court below shall release
the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-
with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of
learned Special Judge (POCSO) Act, Darbhanga/Concerned
Court in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No. 52 of 2025,
subject to the following conditions that the petitioner shall
cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available
as and when required by the court.
(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)
Nirmal/-
U T
Checking your session…