Patna High Court
Sunil Kumar Jaiswal @ Sunil JaiswalversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- ANIL KUMAR SINHA
Holding
Anticipatory bail was granted as the allegations could be examined in trial and custodial interrogation was not required.
Summary
The petitioner, Sunil Kumar Jaiswal, entered into a partnership to run a rice mill on land owned by the complainant’s wife and invested Rs.6,00,000. The partnership failed to deliver rice to the Bihar State Food Corporation, leading to a liability of Rs.34,80,420. The complainant alleges that the petitioner forged a partnership dissolution deed to evade payment, invoking IPC sections 420, 465, 467 and 468. The petitioner sought anticipatory bail, contending that the forgery allegation is unproven and can be examined in a full trial. The court noted that the allegations rest on documents that can be tested during trial and that custodial interrogation was unnecessary, and therefore granted anticipatory bail with conditions under CrPC section 438(2).
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner despite allegations of forgery under IPC sections 420, 465, 467 and 468.
Legislation cited
- Code of Criminal Procedure — s. 438
- Indian Penal Code — s. 420, 465, 467, 468
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- forgery
- partnership dispute
- rice mill
- IPC 420
- IPC 465
- IPC 467
- IPC 468
- CrPC 438
- bail
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64748 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-888 Year-2016 Thana- PURNIA COMPLAINT CASE District-
Purnia
======================================================
Sunil Kumar Jaiswal @ Sunil Jaiswal S/o Late Ram Nath Jaiswal R/o
Mohalla- Chandan Nagar, Bageshwari Astha, Gulabbagh, P.S.- Sadar,
District- Purnea, At present R/o Line Bazar (Near the Resident of Dr. Raj
Kumar Eye Specialist), P.S.- K.Hat, District- Purnea, Bihar
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Paras Kumar Jaiswal S/o Late Janki Prasad Jaiswal Resident of Chandan
Nagar, Bageshwari Asthan, Gulab Bagh, P.S.- Sadar, District- Purnea
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shashi Bhushan Kumar
For the State : Mr.Anish Chandra
For the O. P. No. 2 : Mr. Bhola Prasad
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA
ORAL ORDER
4 24-02-2026 1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Counsel
for the complainant/Opposite Party No. 2 and learned
Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out
of Complaint Case No. 888 of 2016, in which the learned
District Court has taken cognizance for the offences
punishable under Sections 420/465/467/468 of the Indian
Penal Code.
3. The prosecution case, as per the complaint petition, is that
the complainant and the petitioner entered into an
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64748 of 2025(4) dt.24-02-2026
2/4
agreement for running a rice mill in the land owned by
the wife of the complainant. The petitioner invested a sum
of Rs. 6,00,000/- in the establishment and running of the
rice mill. The partners failed to deliver the agreed
quantity of rice to the Bihar State Food Corporation, due
to which a sum of Rs. 34,80,420/- fallen due upon the
petitioner and the complainant to be paid to the Bihar
State Food Corporation. It has further been alleged that to
evade payment, the petitioner fabricated and a fake
partnership dissolution deed, dated 03.04.2013 was
prepared falsely claiming that their partnership ended
before the defalcation. The forged document carried the
fake signature of the complainant and his wife and was
produced before the Court to mislead.
4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner has not committed any offence in the manner
alleged and the allegation that the petitioner has forged
and fabricated the dissolution deed is not correct and can
be decided in a full-fledged trial. He further submits that
in the dissolution deed, notary seal is also there.
5. On the other hand, learned Counsel for the complainant-
Opposite Party No. 2 vehemently opposes the prayer for
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64748 of 2025(4) dt.24-02-2026
3/4
anticipatory bail and submits that for recovery of a sum of
Rs. 34,80,420/- the Bihar State Food Corporation has
lodged Certificate Case No. 678 of 2024 against both the
partners and the petitioner, in order to evade payment of
his share to the Bihar State Food Corporation, has
prepared a forged and fabricated dissolution deed.
6. Regards being had to the submissions advanced on behalf
of the parties and taking into consideration the fact that
the allegation against the petitioner is based upon
documents, which can be tested in the trial, and custodial
interrogation of the petitioner may not be required, I am
inclined to grant the petitioner privilege of anticipatory
bail.
7. This application is, accordingly, allowed.
8. Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest
or surrender before the Court below within a period of
four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing
bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties
of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub
Divisional Judicial Magistrate Purnea, in connection with
Complaint Case No. 888 of 2016, subject to the condition
laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64748 of 2025(4) dt.24-02-2026
4/4
Procedure.
(Anil Kumar Sinha, J.)
Prabhakar Anand/-
U √ T √
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.