Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Md. BadruddinversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to payment of Rs.5,000 to the victim and compliance with specified bail conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Md. Badruddin, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a FIR (Case No. 279 of 2025) alleging multiple offences under the B.N.S. arising from a dispute at a marriage function. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner assaulted several individuals, including delivering a "tengari" blow to Mohammad Akhtar. The petitioner contended that the FIR was exaggerated, the injuries were minor, he had no prior criminal record, and offered to pay Rs.5,000 to the victim as compensation. The State opposed the bail, maintaining the allegations of assault. The High Court, after considering the submissions, granted anticipatory bail subject to a payment of Rs.5,000 to the victim, a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, and a series of conditions regarding appearance, attendance, and non‑interference with witnesses. The order stipulated that the bail would be effective if the petitioner is arrested or surrenders within four weeks.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail under the circumstances of the FIR.
  • Whether the court may impose a condition of monetary compensation to the victim as part of anticipatory bail.
  • Whether the alleged nature of the injuries and the petitioner's lack of antecedents justify granting bail.

Legislation cited

  • B.N.S. — s. 109(1), 115(2), 118(1), 126(2), 303(2), 308(3), 324(4), 3(5), 352

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • bail bond
  • assault
  • criminal procedure
  • Bihar

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6532 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-279 Year-2025 Thana- PHULPARAS District- Madhubani
                 ======================================================
                 Md. Badruddin Son of Md. Masharu Resident of Village- Godhiyari, P.S.-
                 Phulparas, District- Madhubani

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s    :        Mr. Bhavesh Kumar Sah, Advocate
                                         :        Ms. Archna Aanand, Advocate
                 For the State           :        Mr. Md. Mushtaque Alam, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   01-04-2026                     Heard Mr. Bhavesh Kumar Sah, learned counsel for

                   the petitioner and learned APP representing the State.

                                  2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in

                   connection with Phulparas P.S. Case No. 279 of 2025 registered

                   for the offence under Sections 126(2), 308(3), 115(2), 118(1),

                   109(1), 352, 303(2), 324(4) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., lodged on

                   27.06.2025 by the informant, Md. Mujahir.

                                  3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged

                   that on minor dispute at a marriage function, the accuse started

                   assaulting and allegation against this petitioner is of giving

                   ‘tengari’ blow to Mohammad Akhtar beside assaulting the

                   informant. Mohammad Anwarul and Mohammad Sufiyan also

                   assaulted. This led to the F.I.R..
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6532 of 2026(4) dt.01-04-2026
                                            2/4




                       4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

          exaggerated F.I.R. is there, the injuries have been found to be

          simple in nature, the petitioner do not have criminal antecedent

          and there is counter version of this case also. Last submission is

          that without accepting the allegation or outcome of the present

          petition, the petitioner intends to pay Rs.5,000/- to the

          Mohammad Akhtar through the informant towards treatment by

          Demand Draft issued by the local branch of the State Bank of

          India/any Nationalized Bank to be submitted at the time of

          execution of bail bond.

                       5. Learned APP opposes the prayer submitting that

          allegation of assault is against this petitioner.

                       6. Considering the submissions put forward by the

          parties and perusing the record, this Court is inclined to extend

          him the privilege of anticipatory bail subject to payment of

          Rs.5,000/- to Mohammad Akhtar through the informant as

          undertaken by the learned counsel for the petitioner through

          Demand Draft issued by the local branch of the State Bank of

          India/any Nationalized Bank to be submitted at the time of

          execution of the bail bond and the same shall be handed over to

          Mohammad Akhtar through the informant after checking

          credentials.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6532 of 2026(4) dt.01-04-2026
                                            3/4




                       7. Let the petitioner be released on bail in the event of

          arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from the

          receipt of this order, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-

          (Ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the

          satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II,

          Jhanjharpur, Madhubani,             in connection with Phulparas P.S.

          Case No. 279 of 2025 subject to the following conditions:-

                       (i) one of the bailor should be the family

          member/relative of the petitioner who shall provide official

          document (Aadhar Card/Voter Id/Driving License/Pan Card) to

          show his/her bona fide;

                       (ii) the petitioner shall be appearing before the Police

          Station as and when required for cooperating in the

          investigation;

                       (iii) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date

          before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive

          dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his/her

          bail bond by the Trial Court itself;

                       (iv) the petitioner shall appear before the concerned

          police station every month for next six months to mark his

          attendance and at the end of the period a certificate be submitted

          before the Trial Court failing which the State shall be at liberty
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6532 of 2026(4) dt.01-04-2026
                                                        4/4




                      to take steps for cancellation of bail bonds;

                                   (v) the petitioner shall in no way try to induce or

                      promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences,

                      failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for

                      cancellation of the bail bonds;

                                   (vi) the petitioner shall desist from committing any

                      criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty

                      to take steps for cancellation of bail bonds.



                                                     (Rajiv Roy, J)
vinayak/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.