Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Jitan Bind @ Jitan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted regular bail to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Jitan Bind, was charged with murder under IPC sections 304B and 34 and with offences under Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, alleged to have arisen from a dowry demand for a motorcycle. The father of the deceased initially reported that the petitioner and his family were assaulting the victim, but later said they were taking her to the hospital for ailments. The post‑mortem report showed no external injuries and the forensic laboratory report found no poison, leading the defence to argue that the death was due to natural causes. The counsel contended that the petitioner was falsely implicated and highlighted that co‑accused had already been granted anticipatory bail. Considering the lack of conclusive forensic evidence and the circumstances, the Court ordered the release of the petitioner on regular bail with a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties, subject to cooperation with the trial.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail can be granted in a dowry‑death case under IPC 304B/34 and the Dowry Prohibition Act.
  • Whether the absence of external injuries and inconclusive post‑mortem findings justify granting bail.
  • Whether the petitioner poses a risk of fleeing or tampering with evidence.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • dowry death
  • IPC 304B
  • regular bail
  • post‑mortem report
  • forensic report
  • anticipatory bail
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65901 of 2025
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-216 Year-2023 Thana- SHIVSAGAR District- Rohtas
                 ======================================================
                 Jitan Bind @ Jitan Kumar S/o Bulla Bind Resident of Village - Machwar, P.S
                 - Sheosagar, District - Rohtas

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s      :      Mr.Raghunandan Kumar Singh
                 For the State             :      Mrs.Pushpa Sinha, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR
                 PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   29-01-2026                            Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

                                        2. This is an application for regular bail on behalf

                   of the petitioner for the offences alleged under Section

                   304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the

                   Dowry Prohibition Act, registered in connection with Shivsagar

                   P.S.Cased No. 216 of 2023.

                                  3. The informant, who is the father of the deceased,

                   received telephonic call from the Mausi of the deceased that the

                   petitioner (husband)          and his family members were brutally

                   assaulting his daughter. Soon thereafter, the father of the

                   petitioner apprised the informant that they were carrying his

                   daughter to the hospital. Thereafter he disconnected the call.

                   The daughter of the informant died in the Sadar Hospital. The
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65901 of 2025(4) dt.29-01-2026
                                            2/3




          reason for occurrence is alleged due to non-fulfillment of

          demand of motor-cycle in dowry.

                       4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted

          that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated.

          The deceased died due to ailments and the father of the

          petitioner himself apprised the family members of the deceased

          when she was being shifted to the hospital. The learned counsel

          has submitted further that the doctor who conducted the autopsy,

          was not definite about the cause of death, and he opined the

          cause of death as suspected case of poisoning. But the FSL

          report shows that the viscera did not contain any kind of

          poisonous substance, which clearly establishes that the victim

          died due to ailments. The learned counsel has also submitted

          that, according to the FIR, the accused persons, were brutally

          assaulting the deceased, but no external injury was found on her

          person.     Other      co-accused       persons      have   been   granted

          anticipatory bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court in

          Cr.Misc.No. 35772 of 2025 under order dated 18.06.2025.

                       5. The father of the petitioner himself apprised the

          informant that they were carrying his daughter to the hospital as

          she was suffering from ailments. There is no external injury on

          the person of the deceased, according to the post mortem report.
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65901 of 2025(4) dt.29-01-2026
                                                       3/3




                     It was a suspected case of poisoning and, that too, was not

                     established in the FSL report relating to the viscera.                   The

                     petitioner is in custody since 25.04.2025.

                                  6. Considering the above facts and circumstances, let

                     the petitioner, above-named, be released on bail on furnishing

                     bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the

                     like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief

                     Judicial Magistrate Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with

                     Shivsagar P.S.Case No. 216 of 2023,                  subject to the condition

                     that the petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and

                     make himself available as and when required by the court.


                                          (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)

HR/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.