Patna High Court
Mukesh Kumar @ Sager KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
- Bench
- PRAVEEN KUMAR
Holding
The court permitted the petitioner to withdraw the application, dismissing it as withdrawn while granting liberty to raise the grounds later.
Summary
Mukesh Kumar filed an application in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 6593 of 2024 arising from PS case No. 337 of 2022. The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the application while retaining the liberty to raise all grounds at a later stage of the trial. The learned counsel for the petitioner requested this liberty and the court considered the request. Justice Praveen Kumar granted permission to withdraw the application and clarified that the court was not expressing any opinion on the merits. Consequently, the application was dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioner to raise the grounds later.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the pending application with liberty to raise the grounds later in the trial
Subjects
- criminal procedure
- withdrawal of application
- procedural liberty
- trial stage
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6593 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-337 Year-2022 Thana- LAUKARIA District- West Champaran
======================================================
Mukesh Kumar @ Sager Kumar S/o Indrashan Ram @ Igrasan Ram R/o Vill
- Parsa Mathiya, P.S. - Lauria, Dist. - West Champaran
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arvind Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dinesh Singh, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 16-03-2026 Heard the parties.
2. At the very outset, the learned counsel for
petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with
liberty to the petitioner to raise all the grounds at an appropriate
stage in the trial.
3. Permission is accorded.
4. Accordingly, the present application is dismissed as
withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty to the petitioner.
5. It is clarified that this Court has not expressed any
opinion on the merits of the case.
(Praveen Kumar, J)
Jyoti/-
U T
Checking your session…