Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Manish Kumar @ Deepak KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court allowed the withdrawal of the anticipatory bail application, dismissing it as withdrawn.

Summary

Manish Kumar filed an anticipatory bail application under criminal procedure. His counsel later sought the court's permission to withdraw the application. The court considered whether such withdrawal could be permitted. It granted the request, allowing the petitioner to withdraw the anticipatory bail plea. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether the court may permit the withdrawal of an anticipatory bail application.

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • criminal procedure
  • Section 438 CrPC

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66100 of 2025
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-28 Year-2025 Thana- RUPASPUR District- Patna
                  ======================================================
                  Manish Kumar @ Deepak Kumar S/o Narendra Singh Resident of village-
                  Faridpur, PS- Janipur, Distt.- Patna

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner       :        Mr. Purushotam Sharma , Advocate
                  For the State            :        Ms. Pushpa Sinha.1, APP
                  For the Informant        :        Mr. Anshuman Singh, Advocate
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
                                        ORAL ORDER

6    13-01-2026                  Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                    petitioner, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State and

                    learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.

                                 2. At the outset, learned counsel appearing on behalf

                    of the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory

                    bail application.

                                 3. Permission, as prayed for, is accorded.

                                 4. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application

                    stands dismissed as withdrawn.



                                           (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
shashank/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.