Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Bishnu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted bail to the petitioner, subject to bond and conditions, finding the victim’s conduct voluntary and the circumstances sufficient to justify release.

Summary

Bishnu Kumar was arrested in connection with a case alleging that he, along with co‑accused, enticed a 15‑year‑old girl, the informant’s daughter, away from her home, leading to charges under Sections 137(2), 140(1) and 61(2) read with 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. The petitioner claimed the girl went with him of her own free will, citing a love affair, her refusal to undergo a medical exam, and the two‑day delay in filing the FIR as evidence of voluntariness. The State opposed bail, arguing the seriousness of the alleged offence involving a minor. The Court, after considering the voluntary nature of the girl’s conduct, the delay in the FIR, and the fact that a chargesheet had already been filed, granted bail subject to a Rs.10,000 bond, two sureties, and conditions under Section 480(3) of the B.N.S.S. The bail order also required the petitioner’s presence at court dates and stipulated cancellation if conditions were breached.

Issues considered

  • Whether the alleged enticement of a minor constitutes an offence warranting denial of bail
  • Whether the voluntary conduct of the victim and the delay in filing the FIR justify granting bail
  • Whether the petitioner’s prior pending case and custody period affect bail eligibility

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • kidnapping
  • minor
  • voluntary conduct
  • FIR delay
  • criminal procedure
  • section 480(3) conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6622 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-461 Year-2025 Thana- LAKHISARAI District- Lakhisarai
                 ======================================================
                 Bishnu Kumar S/o Subodh Saw, R/o Vill.- Mankatha Bodhi Tola, P.S-
                 Amhara, Dist- Lakhisarai.
                                                                       ... ... Petitioner
                                             Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Rajive Ranjan Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Rabindra Kumar, Advocate
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   04-02-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                   2. In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in

                   connection with Lakhisarai P.S. Case No. 461 of 2025 dated

                   08.10.2025, registered for the offences punishable under

                   Sections 137(2), 140(1) and 61(2) read with Section 3(5) of the

                   B.N.S., 2023.

                                   3. As per the prosecution case, the fifteen years old

                   daughter of informant went missing and informant later came to

                   know that this petitioner along with other co-accused persons

                   enticed his daughter away.

                                   4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and he has falsely

                   been implicated in the present case. The daughter of the

                   informant went with the petitioner out of her own sweet will.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6622 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026
                                            2/3




          Both of them lived together for eight days in Surat and she did

          not raise any alarm during this period. It shows the voluntary

          nature of the act of the victim girl. The victim girl, in her

          statement recorded under Section 183 of the B.N.S.S., has stated

          about her love affair with the petitioner. The victim girl further

          refused to undergo medical examination. The FIR has been

          lodged after delay of two days without any explanation. Learned

          counsel next submits that petitioner is having antecedent of one

          case in which he is on bail and chargesheet has been submitted.

          Learned counsel lastly submits that petitioner is in custody since

          15.10.2025.

                          5. Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State

          opposes the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner.

                          6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and

          submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the

          voluntary nature of the act of the victim girl and further

          considering the period of custody of the petitioner and

          submission of chargesheet, the petitioner, above-named, is

          directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of

          Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of

          the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial

          Magistrate, Lakhisarai / concerned Court, in connection with
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6622 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026
                                                      3/3




                    Lakhisarai P.S. Case No. 461 of 2025, subject to the condition

                    laid down under Section 480(3) of the B.N.S.S. and other

                    following conditions:

                                    (i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the

                    petitioner.

                                    (ii) The petitioner will remain present on each and

                    every date fixed by the court below, if so required by the learned

                    trial Court.

                                    (iii) In case of absence on three consecutive dates

                    or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the

                    petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the Court concerned.



                                                                   (Arun Kumar Jha, J)

Shahnawaz/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.