Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Mohan Kumar Yadav @ Sunil Kumar Yadav @ Mohan YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner with specified conditions.

Summary

Mohan Kumar Yadav was arrested in connection with a FIR (PS Case No. 413 of 2025) alleging multiple offences including assault, firing, and violations under the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act, 2023 and the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with co‑accused, assaulted the informant’s family and fired upon them, causing injuries. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated because he is the son of a co‑accused, that the allegations against him were vague and non‑specific, and that he is a student preparing for competitive exams. He had been in custody since 13 November 2025 and sought bail, arguing lack of concrete evidence linking him to the alleged acts. The court, noting the non‑specific nature of the accusations and the petitioner’s period of custody, granted bail subject to a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and conditions under Section 480(3) of the B.N.S.S.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner given the vague and non‑specific allegations against him
  • Whether the conditions imposed under Section 480(3) of the B.N.S.S. are appropriate

Legislation cited

  • Arms Act — s. 27
  • B.N.S. — s. 109(1), 115(2), 117(2), 118(2), 190, 191(2), 191(3), 351(2), 351(3), 352, 49, 74, 76
  • B.N.S.S. — s. 480(3)

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • vague allegations
  • land dispute
  • Arms Act
  • Bihar Negotiable Securities Act

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6684 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-413 Year-2025 Thana- PHULPARAS District- Madhubani
                 ======================================================
                 Mohan Kumar Yadav @ Sunil Kumar Yadav @ Mohan Yadav S/o- Shiv
                 Kumar Yadav, R/o village - Hariyari , P.S.- Phulparas , District - Madhubani.

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                          ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Ravi Prakash, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Nitya Nand Tiwary, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   04-02-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                   2. In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in

                   connection with Phulparas P.S. Case No. 413 of 2025 dated

                   30.09.2025, registered for the offences punishable under

                   Sections 190, 191(2), 191(3), 109(1), 115(2), 117(2), 118(2), 74,

                   76, 351(2), 351(3), 352 and 49 of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section

                   27 of the Arms Act.

                                   3. As per the prosecution case, over shifting of

                   ridge, the husband of the informant and her brother-in-law were

                   assaulted by the petitioner and other co-accused persons. When

                   the informant and her family members went for their rescue,

                   they were also assaulted. The co-accused persons fired upon the

                   informant and her family members and the brother-in-law of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6684 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026
                                            2/3




          informant received pellet injury in his back and other parts of

          the body.

                          4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

          petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and he has falsely

          been implicated in the present case. No specific overt act has

          been attributed to the petitioner and allegations are general and

          omnibus except for allegation of firing against co-accused

          persons. Altogether 9 persons have been made accused in this

          case including the petitioner and from the contents of the FIR, it

          appears the specific allegations are against the co-accused Shiv

          Kumar Yadav, Krishna Yadav and Ganga Yadav. The petitioner

          has been roped in this case merely because he is son of the co-

          accused Shiv Kumar Yadav and he is a student and is preparing

          for competitive examinations. Land dispute is apparent from the

          FIR and in this background this false case has been lodged.

          Learned counsel next submits that petitioner is having

          antecedent of one case and is in custody since 13.11.2025.

                          5. Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State

          opposes the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner.

                          6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and

          submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the

          non-specific and vague nature of allegation against the
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6684 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026
                                                      3/3




                    petitioner and also considering his period of custody, the

                    petitioner, above-named, is directed to be released on bail, on

                    furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand

                    Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

                    satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II,

                    Jhanjharpur / concerned Court, in connection with Phulparas

                    P.S. Case No. 413 of 2025, subject to the condition laid down

                    under Section 480(3) of the B.N.S.S. and other following

                    conditions:

                                    (i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the

                    petitioner.

                                    (ii) The petitioner will remain present on each and

                    every date fixed by the court below, if so required by the learned

                    trial Court.

                                    (iii) In case of absence on three consecutive dates

                    or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the

                    petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the Court concerned.



                                                                    (Arun Kumar Jha, J)

Shahnawaz/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.