Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Dharmendra Kumar SinhaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

Anticipatory bail was not granted to the petitioner.

Summary

Dharmendra Kumar Sinha, a deed writer, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a criminal case (PS Case No. 209 of 2025) involving alleged alteration of property details under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act, 2023. The prosecution alleged that Sinha, as a deed writer, was responsible for changing deed details on his computer. The petitioner argued he had no role in the offence and cited that the purchaser had already been granted bail. The Court held that the deed could be altered only by the deed writer, making the petitioner a material participant, and therefore refused anticipatory bail. The Court dismissed the anticipatory bail application, ordered the petitioner to surrender within four weeks, and directed him to seek regular bail, warning of arrest if he failed to comply.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner accused of altering property deed details under the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act, 2023.

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • deed writer
  • property fraud
  • criminal procedure
  • Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act
  • bail dismissal

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6709 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-209 Year-2025 Thana- SAMASTIPUR District- Samastipur
                 ======================================================
                 Dharmendra Kumar Sinha Son of Vidya Sagar Sinha R/O Vill.- Musapur
                 Dhankaul, P.S.- Patepur, Dist.- Vaishali.

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.    Amit Kumar Mandal, District Sub-Registrar, Samastipur. Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Manish Kumar
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr.Anand Kishore Choudhary
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   24-02-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                   2.         The petitioner apprehends his arrest in

                   connection with Samastipur Town P.S. Case No. 209 of 2025

                   registered for the offence under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338,

                   336(3), 340(2), 341(1), 61(2) of the BNS, 2023.

                                   3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is a

                   deed writer and the allegation against him of of changing the

                   property details.

                                   4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   the petitioner being a deed writer, has no role to play in the

                   alleged offence and the purchaser has already been granted bail

                   vide order dated 17.02.2026 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 89366 of
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6709 of 2026(2) dt.24-02-2026
                                                      2/2




                    2025.

                                    5. In the opinion of this Court, the aforesaid

                    submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is not

                    appealing as the change in the deed details can be done only by

                    the deed writer on his computer and the same cannot be done by

                    anyone else.

                                    6. Considering the aforesaid facts, this Court is not

                    inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner even if the

                    purchaser has already been granted anticipatory bail.

                                     7.    Accordingly, this application for anticipatory

                    bail is dismissed.

                                    8. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the

                    Court below within four weeks from today and pray for regular

                    bail failing which the Superintendent of Police, Samastipur will

                    take all steps for arrest of the accused person/s including the

                    petitioner.

                                    9.     Let a copy of this order this order be

                    communicated to the Superintendent of Police, Samastipur

                    through FAX for its compliance.


                                                            (Sandeep Kumar, J)
Vikas/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.