Patna High Court
GANESH KUMAR YADAV @ GANESH KUMARversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- WITHDRAWN
- Bench
- SONI SHRIVASTAVA
Holding
The Court dismissed the pending application as withdrawn.
Summary
The petition in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 67155 of 2021 was filed by Ganesh Kumar Yadav against the State of Bihar and Nathuni Yadav. The petition sought relief, but during the pendency of the case the petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Ranjay Kumar Singh, informed the Court that the petitioner wished to withdraw the application. The counsel explained that the petitioner had filed a separate quashing application before the same Court. The Court considered the request to withdraw the pending application. In view of the petitioner's intention to pursue the matter through the separate quashing application, the Court dismissed the present application as withdrawn.
Issues considered
- Whether a pending application can be withdrawn after the case has progressed and a separate application has been filed
Subjects
- withdrawal of application
- procedural law
- criminal miscellaneous proceedings
- quashing application
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67155 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-5 Year-2020 Thana- SUPAUL District- Supaul
======================================================
GANESH KUMAR YADAV @ GANESH KUMAR Son of Late Sukumar
Yadav Resident of Village- Menha, P.S.- Marouna, at present Address-
Supaul, Ward No. 15, P.S. and District- Supaul.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Nathuni Yadav Son of Late Bhuwan Yadav Resident of Village- Sukela, P.S.-
Supaul, District- Supaul.
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjay Kumar Singh, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Binod Kumar, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA
ORAL ORDER
4 05-01-2026 Mr. Ranjay Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the
petitioner prays for withdrawing the present application as the
stage of the case has progressed and challenging the same he
has filed a separate quashing application before this Court.
2. In such view of the matter, this application is
dismissed as withdrawn.
(Soni Shrivastava, J)
Trivedi/-
U T
Checking your session…