Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Pawan DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner subject to a bond of Rs 10,000 and two sureties, with conditions for cooperation and possible cancellation for non‑cooperation.

Summary

Pawan Devi, the mother‑in‑law of the deceased, was charged with cruelty, attempted murder and dowry‑related offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 307, 498A/34 and later 304B, as well as sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. She applied for bail, asserting that she surrendered immediately after the court had granted her liberty to do so and has been in custody since 1 August 2025. The petitioner contended that the deceased’s own fard‑beyan, recorded on 30 October 2016, stated that the fire was accidental and denied any dowry demand, and that the husband, who is primarily responsible, is already in custody. The State opposed bail, arguing that the first fard‑beyan is unreliable and that the petitioner had previously absconded. The court, noting the petitioner’s prompt surrender, the custody of co‑accused, and the lack of evidence of kerosene smell, granted bail on a bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties, directing the trial court to expedite framing of charges and warning that bail may be cancelled for non‑cooperation. The order also instructed the trial court to proceed expeditiously with the trial.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner despite the serious nature of the charges including dowry death and attempted murder.
  • Whether the deceased’s fard‑beyan negates the prosecution’s allegation of dowry demand and intentional burning.
  • Whether the petitioner’s surrender after being granted liberty and her custody status affect the bail decision.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • dowry death
  • cruelty
  • IPC
  • Dowry Prohibition Act
  • accidental fire
  • fardbeyan
  • trial court
  • surety

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67171 of 2025
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-138 Year-2016 Thana- SAHIYARA District- Sitamarhi
                 ======================================================
                 Pawan Devi W/o Shri Ram Babu Singh @ Ram Babu Singh @ Ram Babu
                 Sinha Resident of Village - Harkesh, P.S. - Sahiyara, District - Sitamarhi
                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus
                 The State of Bihar                                    ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Sr. Adv.
                                                  Mr. Dinesh Jha, Adv.
                 For the State            :       Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA
                                       ORAL ORDER

6   16-02-2026                    Heard Mr. Ramakant Sharma, learned senior counsel for

                   the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the

                   State.

                                  2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the

                   offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 498(A)/34 of the

                   Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the D.P. Act and

                   subsequently Section 304(B) of the IPC was added.

                                  3. Petitioner along with other accused persons are said

                   to have committed cruelty and to have burnt the informant after

                   pouring kerosene oil for non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.

                                  4. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner has

                   submitted, at the outset, that upon a liberty granted to the

                   petitioner vide an order dated 14.07.2025 passed by this Court to

                   surrender and seek regular bail, the petitioner immediately

                   surrendered and is in custody since 01.08.2025. It is further

                   submitted that the first information report itself was lodged after a
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67171 of 2025(6) dt.16-02-2026
                                            2/3




          delay of 8 days and the petitioner being the mother-in-law totally

          denies the allegation of any dowry demand and torture being

          meted out to the deceased. As a matter of fact, the deceased died

          due to accidental fire and this fact has been admitted by the

          deceased herself by way of her fardbeyan which was recorded on

          30.10.2016 before the police in the presence of the treating doctor

          and the said fardbeyan is Annexure P/3 to the petition. The father

          of the informant subsequently in collusion of the police got the

          second statement recorded on 04.11.2016 without any certificate

          of the right physical and mental condition of the deceased by the

          doctor. It has also been submitted that in the connected case of the

          husband of the deceased, the doctor has been examined as P.W.-4

          and he has stated in his deposition that he did not notice any smell

          of kerosene oil from the body of the deceased. Further, the

          husband of the deceased is already in custody and is facing trial

          and the petitioner undertakes to cooperate in the trial.

                       5. Learned APP for the State and the learned counsel for

          the informant have opposed the application for bail. Learned

          counsel for the informant has submitted that the first fardbeyan of

          the deceased is not worth believing and the petitioner has also

          absconded for a long time and as such, does not deserve the

          benefit of bail.

                           6.    Taking     into    consideration   the   facts   and
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67171 of 2025(6) dt.16-02-2026
                                                         3/3




                       circumstances and also considering the fact that after the liberty

                       granted by this Court to the petitioner to surrender and seek

                       regular bail, the petitioner immediately surrendered and has

                       remained in custody since 01.08.2025 coupled with the fact that

                       the other co-accused persons have already been granted bail and

                       the husband of the deceased, who is primarily responsible for the

                       welfare of the wife, is already in custody and is also facing trial,

                       let the above named petitioner, be enlarged on bail on furnishing

                       bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties

                       of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court

                       below where the case is pending/successor court in connection

                       with Sahiyara P.S. Case No. 138 of 2016.

                                        7. However, the learned trial court is directed to

                       proceed with the case expeditiously and take all endevours for

                       framing of charges in which the petitioner shall fully cooperate

                       and in case there is any non-cooperation on behalf of the petitioner

                       and delay is caused on account of this petitioner, the learned court

                       concerned shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds.


                                                 (Soni Shrivastava, J)
devendra/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.